The Process
The issue is TRUST. The consequence needs to reflect the same. Each time trust is violated the consequence must be bigger and longer lasting than before.
What if…
The question that comes up most often in this process is, “What if someone breaks one of the agreements?” The answer has three parts:
Violating an agreement from the third group (Minor) can be handled with a minor, but effective consequence. For example, the husband hurts his wife’s feelings by being inconsiderate. Her response (consequence) could be to ignore him for a few days. The goal here is to emphasize the importance of keeping the agreements, to avoid future problems. But, let’s say that the husband’s behavior does not change or improve. She may have to impose a larger consequence, and maybe for a longer period of time. For example, she may decide to stop washing his clothes and preparing them for him (for his work) until he changes the behavior, or improves his attitude. Violations at this level are more common due to the fact that both parties are human. Humans will fail at times, but that does not mean they have an excuse to continue misbehaving.
Mid-level agreement violations are more serious. The person violating the agreement is proving that he or she is not as concerned with maintaining a peaceful and orderly relationship with the spouse. This person is willing to endanger the relationship with decisions and/or actions which can have lasting repercussions. A violation at this level could be something like: The couple have an agreement that neither may spend money from the main budget with the agreement of both of them. The wife decides to buy a dress and a pair of shoes without consulting her husband, even though she knew he was about to pay the bills. The husband, who is the manager of the finances for the couple, sends out monthly payments. Two of the checks bounce, causing the couple to pay penalty fees. The wife’s dress and shoes suddenly cost the couple much more money than what she intended. On top of that, it caused an argument that could have been avoided. The consequence the husband imposes on the wife is to give up her debit card for half a year, and only buy with cash.
Major agreement violations are the most serious of all. These are those type that could result in long term separation, as well as divorce. For example, the couple have an agreement which states that neither may have a friend of the opposite sex without the knowledge and consent of the other. The wife finds out that her husband went to lunch, at work, with a female employee. She asks him what is going on. He claims that they are just “friends.” She argues that she never agreed for him to have that woman as a “friend.” The arguments between the two has the potential of escalating to the point of accusations of adultery becoming real. The problem could have been avoided, but the husband, in this case, did not care if he hurt his relationship with his wife. The consequences must be big and last some time.
The way to consider things is:
The first time someone does something, it could be a mistake, or an error in judgment.
The second time someone does something, it is questionable, but could be an oversight. They weren’t paying attention.
The third time someone does something, it is on purpose. They meant to do it and did not care about the consequences to themselves or others.