your take is just so immensely valuable always. i am really happy when this topic is done with, as i may have taken on too much workload here.

anything for humanity's ability to dissect ideas and discern right?

i see the logic in your argument however i do not have that luxury any longer, the luxury of the supporting narratives. they all go hand in hand, and they often need each other.

concretely i am saying i am no longer convinced that earth is actually 4 billion years old, nor that it formed the way we are told nor that it is what we are told it is. it COULD be, sure but that does not negate all the counter arguments i have had to consider on THAT topic alone.

i like analogies and your example. let me misuse it ahaha.

just because the thing looks like a bank from the outside and everybody tells me "oh yes that is definitely a bank in that building and has been here forever" doesn't make it so. especially after i found out by others that the whole district has been founded by japanese monks and that most of the building are not brick and mortar all the way but merely have brick facades.

not sure that analogy is so helpful ahahahhaa.

i am not convinced that humanity arose from monkeys, that cross-kind darwinian evolution takes place at all or that this place is as old as they say it is. could list many other things i have open questions about but that will not help this topic in question here so restrain myself.

what i am saying is i cannot refer to these external circumstances like you do because to me they have ceased to be certain and solid ground. they have instead become unlikely.

i do however see that this topic of viruses is particularly difficult because it is so hard to verify this for ourselves. but this is often a hint. many of these things i question are somehow removed from immediate scrutiny which should raise an eyebrow.

it doesnt make them wrong by definition, and viruses can definitely exist!

but until factual evidence for their existence is presented and not simply assumed, we cannot pretend that their existence is the most likely explanation for disease, epidemics and ill health. if we do we are not being neutral but would instead be thinking inside the box we are trying to leave to get a better view.

more on this will follow when i get that dub released. this willner lecture does not cover enough of the issues with the virus narrative to convince anyone. it's just a tiny voice in a much larger discussion.

as always thanks for your attention. may we all be wrong and find that out as quickly as possible so we can get back to other things, ahahaha

blessings