Well, I do think I just heard him say that in the Rumble video. He admits both that he said MLK was a bad guy, and that he said the act was a mistake. He just doesn't get into why he thought those things. I want to hear his argument in support of his statements.
I like that he openly admits his views have changed. He even admits that he used to think MLK as "holy" as the rest of us have come to believe. M:Ks holiness is what is suspect to Kirk, not everything he stood for. There really could have been aspects to MLK that were awful. Was his comment directed to only those things, those human flaws MLK must have had, that we are not told? I find this whole thing very interesting. Why do we think what we think? Many of us think we figure stuff out via critical thinking, when what really has happened is that we believe what we have been told.
RE: Freedom of Speech