So you know, they would have been hearsay testimony, Walter, hearsay. Yes, he would have accepted hearsay testimony. Donald Trump is implicated in the FC file.
I know because the waiter who worked there's a waiter who worked there told a friend and the friend has come forward. But the waiter is missing or deceased. They would have done it on hearsay.
Yes. Anybody who doubts for a second Garland would have not weaponized any part of the FC list that would have incriminated Donald Trump. You're delusional.
You know why? Bonnie Willis would have done it. Alan Bragg would have done it. Judge Agron, Marshawn, every single one of these idiots, Jack Smith would have ran to the hills with that.
Exactly. Please spare me. And that's what the point is.
Like, it's just like this whole nonsense like this, like in here. And like what I don't understand is, so what is the theory here that Trump went through four years of all these prosecutions just so he could get back into the presidency just so he could then cover for the Epstein files? Like, are you? The logic is just so it's so illogical to me that it's hard to even discuss with people because people don't want to be rational about it. Like, there are rational ways to discuss that topic.
There are perfectly rational ways to discuss it. Like, OK, why don't you go back and look at all the victims from the Epstein, you know, compensation victims group and see if any of those people because in their filings that they paid when they were paid out compensation, they had the opportunity to list other names of co-defendants that they did not want to be protected by their party. So they had that opportunity.