I'm not sure if the ruling elite are preventing this info from spreading, or if there just isn't anyone out there trying to spread it.
I'm am certain that I will not learn EVERYTHING about the subject from 2 YouTube video, that was an outrageous claim you made.
I had to look up Ben Davidson, and I assume you didn't mean the actor or the football player 😁. He had some useful info on there, better magnetic field info for the last 5 years than I had gotten so far. He does make some leaps of imagination that I don't agree with 100%, like his claim that pole reversal is tied to large extinction events. The paper that he linked showed a correlation between field reversal and extinction of some species, but didn't even seem to try correlating field reversal with any of the 5 previous known mass extinction events. My thoughts are this: we know we've had pole reversal that were not accompanied by mass extinction, but we also know that many species (like honeybees) rely very directly on the magnetic field for their survival mechanisms. Field weakening and pole reversal is likely to have devastating effect on these populations. The extra radiation (much more than just UVR) will have negative effects on species that cannot process or adapt to it, and this is where there is a lot of grey area and speculation on the sort of harm that pole reversal may cause to life on earth.
If you want to get a good idea about how people would react to the knowledge that a disaster was coming... just look at how people prepare for hurricanes, and extrapolate from that.
The pole reversal will not necessarily be a disaster. It will be disruptive, for sure, but so are solar flares. This would be the first one that we have a chance to directly study in detail. Like with everything, all we can do is learn and prepare the best we can, the rest is in the rolling dice.
RE: A different take on climate change...