Words
87
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y
DPoS is by far the most efficient way of governance, however we can all agree that there's always a possibility that a few wealthy individuals can come to an agreement and play against the network. Thankfully $Hive has the real crypto OGs mostly working voluntary to align ideology with technology, making it unlikely to go against something they too believe in.
But I wouldn't be so sure that to be the case with any other network.
Do you think we should increase the number of consensus witnesses?
RE: Game Theory vs. Practice in Blockchain Governance (PoW vs. PoS vs. DPoS)