Henry Kissinger, a diplomat and former US Secretary of State, in his book World Order explains that there has been a complete change in how we look at current political and armed conflicts around the world. He was born as Heinz Alfred Kissinger in Bavaria. Henrys father was a teacher, and his mother came from a rich Jewish family. Prior to Nazi persecution, he fled to the United States in 1938.
Well known US journalist and economical theorist Frederick William Engdahl in his book on America's Oil and Food geopolitics of the "Century of War" and "Seed of Destruction" directly accuses Kissinger of being responsible for participating in US politics in the 1970s, focusing on the aggressive spread of agribusiness in developing countries, with the aim of destroying agricultural production in those countries.
Kissinger, the head of american national security, has called on US to cooperate with other states in order to create a New world order. It is time, says Kissinger that the global structure is transformed to be sustainable in new political- economic-social circumstances. In the text for the American Wall Street Journal, Henry Kissinger, National Security Adviser and Secretary of State at the time of US President Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, who advised the US administration later, finds the world a chaos. Kissinger, apparently from the text, encourages top world players, and especially the United States, to work together to achieve the ultimate goal of the New World Order.
Libya is in the civil war, the fundamentalist army proclaimed and built the caliphate in Syria and Iraq, and the Afghan young democracy was almost paralyzed. In addition, tensions with Russia have been restored, and relations with China's sling from the story of co-operation to public accusations.
source
Based on the above mentioned Kissinger concludes that the world is on the verge of a major crisis and that it is necessary to prevent it. Paradoxical statement by Kissinger, when we all know that most of both political and economic crises are the result of US foreign policy and interference with the public service.
The pursuit of the world order has long led the Western societies, leading their own concepts of value. After the Second World War, the leadership of the world was taken over by the United States, a nation based on the idea of freedom and representative rule. The United States has tied its pace with the expansion of freedom and democracy, which it has seen as a way to ensure lasting peace in the world.
The expansion of democracy becomes a synonym for a ridiculous US foreign policy, which has become so shallow and superficial that it will not take long for people to understand what it is all about. Their vision of the new world order is based on the creation of a unified government in which the United States, or the interest lobbying within that supreme body, will implement a policy that regulates all areas of life and indirectly governs the Earth.
Democracy in its original sense is definitely the best form of rule, at least so far. The concept of democracy encompasses all those liberties that have been created in bloody battles. Free markets, like all other freedoms, ensure individuals' progress, enrich their culture, and replace economic interdependence with international rivalry. Democracy should support freedom and prosperity of every country and not forcefully subvert and impose totalitarian persecution.
However, it is difficult for the legitimacy requirement to be separated from the concept of strategy by keeping the world order. Europe does not yet have the attributes of the state, which provokes an internal vacuum of power and an imbalance of power at its borders. At the same time, parts of the Middle East were broken down by the sectarian and ethnic key and were in war; the religious militias and the forces that support them violate the borders and the sovereignty of the countries as they aspire, leading to phenomena of failed states that do not control the territory. The challenge in Asia is different and different from the challenges in Europe: the principles of the balance of power predominate independently of the agreed concept of legitimacy, resulting in conflicts at the border of armed confrontation. The conflict between the international economy and its political institutions weakened by the feeling of a common goal that is necessary for the world order.
source
Kissinger claims that world order faces a paradox. Porosperity depends on the success of globalization, but the process provokes a political reaction that often overwhelmes its goals. The next weakness of the current order is the lack of effective mechanism that will serve sas an advisory body of great powers and trough which it will cooperate on the most relevant issues. This seems contradictory given that there are currently more international forums than ever before in history. However, the nature and frequency of these meetings do not go to the elaboration of a long-term strategy, but rather, in the opposite direction, they undermine. Such a situation does not allow it to move beyond the discussion of tactical issues and in the worst possible variant it serves as an event of social value.
The struggle between the regions could be a bigger problem than the struggle between states. That is why the quest for the world order will require a coherent strategy to shape the concept of the internal order in various regions and to establish a relationship between these regions. But these goals are not necessarily related. Specifically, the success of a radical movement that sets the order in one region can simultaneously trigger turmoil in other regions. Military domination of a country in the region, even if it means an internal order, can cause a crisis in the rest of the world.
But what Henry Kissinger and his bosses want to achieve is actually the polarization of society and mutual hatred, intolerance, and clashes between peoples while at the same time he and the like are acquiring additional profits, and then the greater globalization and centralization of the power of the world's elite , all at the expense of the people (history has so far been extravagant). Albert Pike (33rd degree Mason, occultist, philosopher) talked about creating world wars, including the New World Order, as well as many other things that happened in his book "Morals and Dogmas". Do not let them indoctrinate you, keep you positive vibes i fight against injustice. As always i hope you enjoyed, cheers! :)
