Dogmatic Collectivism
A bundle is still a fasces and those who use its symbol want to rule the world.
In an ideal world human kind would be in balance with themselves and everything around them. It is probably easy to understand that it takes at least two individuals to create a group. The dynamics of such a group is determined by the interaction between those individuals. By joining a group the individual will still be a substantive human, instead of becoming one with the collective. That is, when a group of individuals are not bound together as a bundle {fasces->facism}. If they have becoming a collective, centrally controlled through a dogmatic system of governance, as done by a select few, believing they are superior beings, then they have become facism in the flesh. It is the difference between self governance or being government by others, voluntary behavior versus mandatory ruling, by force. Sometimes the 'governance by others' model will have it appear as if people can act voluntary on matters that may have an impact on their lives. While there actually are severe consequences connected to such a (believed to be) voluntary choice by the individual. Such a centrally controlled system could, for instance, first take away 'human rights', due to some reason(s). While offering more 'liberties' as a 'reward' for every level of compliance. Where those who choose voluntary to decline taking part in a certain event, will be denied those 'liberties'. And they will be 'punished' even more, by getting locked out off anything that makes life worth living, or make it possible to live. That is fascism in essence and it starts with dogmatic collectivism getting a majority, so it can become a tyranny.
De-humanization is part of such a dogmatic collectivist control system. It did its horrors in human history before. And it does not matter what it is being connected to and or associated with. It can be a certain religion or a false 'race' claim. As there are no different human races at all, there is only one, the human race and its members are not always kind to each other. (Discrimination based on a false belief of different human races does exist though. And sadly enough so called 'leaders' do add to that, instead of uniting humanity, they divide them by suggesting different human races do exist.) The nazis de-humanized Jewish people and that lead to horrible crimes against humanity. The so called 'medical' experimental part of that, lead by the 'angel of death' Mengele, resulted in the 10 rules of the Nuremberg Code, after the war in the year 1947. Yet, it seems most of the people who could still testify of the gruesome handlings done to human beings back then are not around anymore. (How convenient...) As what is happening right now on a global scale is in many ways against everything those 10 rules stand for. The collectivists have gained an apparent worldwide majority. Where every human alive now has a (falsely suggested) 'free' choice to 'join the hive' or to be de-humanized: "Blend in, or get out!" Of course it is not being propagated like that, because that would be way to bloody obvious and even the most numbed down individual could see it coming. So they are offered free fries, free beer, free lottery tickets and what not. The rest will settle for getting back some of their promised 'liberties'. (Taking away from them in the first place.) Probably getting 'boosting' injections for the rest of their lives. If they survive the risk that is attached to those, that is. It is, after all, a global 'scientific' experiment on human kind where resistance is futile...
One of my favorite science-fiction series is Star Trek - The Next Generation. And metaphorically speaking 'the Borg', appearing in that series, in a very eerie way, are about what dogmatic collectivism will morph into, once their numbers are large enough. The individual has been made obsolete and the collective hive rules, with a 'queen' in control. Force is being used to connect others to the collective. Those connected by force are merged into the collective hive mind and they get physically altered, using 'high end' technology. No longer are they a substantive being. They become part of what presents itself as "We are the Borg...", and they want total control over the whole universe. Of course it is for the best of all, they will not own anything, not even their own identity, and they will be happy. Although that last part does not really seem not to be the case with 'the Borg'. Now, with this kind of science-fiction it is almost too obvious that those who would encounter something like that would actually resist. So, in a way that is where the metaphor ends. Well, if taken literally, it does, but hypothetically speaking, it kind of continues. As a large part of humanity is not physically connected into the hive mind, they are already interfaced with it. Where the hive mind could be seen as what humanity knows as: the internet. Almost everything we know, medium wise, is connected to be used via the world wide web of information. (Who is the spider in this, by the way?) And all that is 'missing' is a direct connection between our physical self and the digital one. Although we are semi-connected like that, because it still can be faked. Others can act as our digital self, if they are logged in, using our Identity Information. So, next up is the actually physical individual connection to the digital identity. And, sure, you are perfectly safe, your privacy will be honored, just like your individual declared human rights are...
"Imagine your brain being connected via an interface to all the information available on the world wide web...", well, no, thank you very much, but NO THANK YOU! Still, I guess I will see people dancing and singing when the day comes that they are getting connected to the internet. That would not be the case of course when the system that offers it them to do so 'voluntarily' would present itself like: "We are the Borg, prepare to be added to the hive mind. And oh, by the way, resistance is futile..." No matter how much free fries and hamburgers they would add, there would not be dancing and singing masses going to get the injection(s) to make it all happen. "Do it for the collective hive mind then, become one with us, you'll own nothing (not even yourself) and you'll be happy...", nope, when presented by something like 'the Borg', forget it, it wont work. Yet, something seems to be at work that is actually 'successfully' pluging in masses of individuals into a collective hive mind part of humanity. Up to a level where those who do are classified like 'the good ones' and those who are resisting to take part in this global centrally controlled 'scientific' experiment on human kind are stigmatized as 'the bad ones'. Where there is already a de-humanization going on, yet mostly hidden in the background noise of all the biased mass media buzz. Tyranny is actually being installed in parts of the world as I am working on this publication. Enforced injection(s) with an experimental 'medical' element are already happening in certain parts of the world. Sure 'voluntary', but if you do not take the injection(s), you will forbidden to come to the office, to work, to school, go on a holiday, join an event, be active in a sport, at some point not even be able to buy groceries and no going out on the streets without the 'C Ausweiss'... And it becomes really dangerous when the masses are actually starting to chant something that sounds like: "We are the Borg, get your injection(s), do it for the collective, resistance is futile..."
Human society is neither strictly individualistic neither collectivist. In an ideal world there would be a dynamic balance between both, well at least I think it would. But, there will always be those who want to socialize human behavior into a (more or less) dogmatic collectivist system. (Basically all dogmatic collectivist setup systems are 'socialist' in its deepest core.) During the last century human kind has come to known those people as fascists, although most of the time not clearly as such. As 'they' (who ever 'they' are) do not want to be exposed as evil squared, 'they' will present themselves to the masses as 'leaders', 'governments' and 'authorities'. 'It' has even given 'itself' the right to use violence AGAINST 'its' believed to be 'subjects' if and when 'it' considers that to be needed. And again if that 'it' where looking like 'the Borg', in the science fiction series Start Trek - The Next Generation, most people would be like: "NO FUCKING WAY, ONLY OVER MY DEAD BODY!" Yet, those who have claimed a monopoly on the use of violence and the creation of money do look like just anybody else. Except for the costumes and uniforms they wear, because at some point the masses have to know to whom they have to submit themselves to. What use is there to all of that dogmatic collectivism, if nobody actually is able to distinct between themselves and some group who belief they have to divide and rule? But how would you and I recognize those who believe they are 'the boss' of us? 'It' needs some way to convince the many to experience 'its' virtual reality setup to be the one and only possible reality. And by just putting some monkeys in a suit with a tie, or a have some little goblin wear a crown on its head, that lives in a way too big house, that just wont do it. Humans need to know, somehow and made to belief that this is the only way to exist as a being on planet earth. (Must be written in stone somewhere...)
Religion once was the ideal way to enforce a dogmatic collectivist system. Have people belief in a 'good' and a 'bad' place where the 'rulers' of such a religion would tell them how to get where and when. It held the poor calm and do as they were told, because they were being watched all the time by an invisible eye. And if they did 'good' they would get rewarded after they had died. Those already had riches could be tricked into believing they could pay for all the 'bad' things they had done. Like not paying the people that did the work for them enough money, so they could have lived a good life. But religions back in the day had a system, get to 'the good place' faster, after leaving this life, by giving the religion all their gathered wealth. Since a certain religion came up with that idea there where huge churches build all over the world. And if you think that the 'pay to get to the good place faster and guaranteed' morality had ended somewhere in our timeline, forget it. In India there are almost 90 million people living (or actually dying) in extreme poverty. One billion Euro (or whatever) could solve a lot of that misery. Every day 17'000 children die before the age of 5. While the rich and famous pray: "Thank You for feeding all the people on earth, thank you for our second home, thank you for us being rich..._" Then one of 'their' expensive temples burns (beautiful architecture, no argue there) and within a week 1 billion Euro was raised to repair that thing. Those who 'gave' probably are getting ahead in line when they get to 'the good place', for sure. While those who did not give money to rebuild the place of worship? Well, down to the 'bad place' of course, where the eternal punishment resides. Now, what kind of loving and caring parent would do that to a child anyway? Seems not a lot has changed though, only the medium for mass control has.
Everybody welcome to the 'free' internet. There are not many things that do not pass through its network of packets. Get it for free, well almost and one never has to go outside in the real world again! Without this medium a 'pandemic' claim could never have spread this fast across the planet as it did. It only takes a jiffy to do so. One would not want a collectivist group to get such a thing under its total control. Because as such it could propagate any big lie and have people accept it as an illusionairy truth, within a matter of hours. Not only that, but it could also censor anything that is unwanted, meaning facts and science that would debunk it. In the days of the nazi collectivist system there was not yet something like TV and especially the Internet, yet 'it' managed to gain control of the masses. There was cinema, radio, large events and in school children were taught to rat out on their parents, when they were critical about the dogmatic collectivist nazi system. Not the parents were taking care of their kids, it was the nazi system that was. Currently parents are taking out off control by the now 'ruling' collectivist system by stating children do not need their parents consent to get the injection(s). Apparently children are wise enough to decide if it is safe to join the 'scientific' experiment on human kind. Sure, there have been a lot of people who died after getting one or more of these 'voluntary' and 'free' injections, but it is worth the risk, right? And therefore, the biased mass media does spread the blatend lie that it is perfectly safe. While governments do provide websites that show large numbers of people who suffered bad side-effects and a fast growing list of those who died. And all of a sudden it is okay to talk about 'co-morbidity', as if that is now the reason for all the misery. But... Hang on, parents who do not want to submit their children to this 'scientific' experiment are being put out of their parental role? Who's kids are they? It reminds me of the lyrics of a certain song by the Manic Street Preachers: "...And if you tolerate this, then your children will be next...!"
Oh, but do not compare this to the nazi collectivist system. That was fascism, this is not. Well, I do tend to disagree, strongly. As again the so called multi-national companies have a dominant key role in all of this. The pharmaceutical industry financed the nazis and did some horrible 'medical' experiments in Auschwitz - Berkenau (Poland). The mass destruction camps (they would now be called 'facilities') there kept the most young and healthy people alive. And every morning a large group of them had to walk about 500 meters to the IG-Farben (pharma / chemical industry, with big names involved like Bayer) 'facilities'. There some had (experimental) surgery without any anesthetics, for example. (These people were de-humanized by the nazis remember? So they were considered lab mice to experiment on.) Others were injected with heavy metallic based chemicals, extremely toxic to the human body. Many of them died suffering horrible pains. This is where I stop, because it is really triggering some vivid imagery in my mind. And that is not making me happy. The worst 'virus' is not a nano-scaled bunch of proteins, but it is a beast known as human beings. And I have been wondering for a large part of my life how it is possible that some human beings can turn into monsters, almost overnight. When a group like that is large enough, in that it becomes a majority, then it can turn into dogmatic collectivism, basically fascism on a global scale. For that total control over a dominant medium is needed. But that is the only reason, there is more.
If the many are into 'the screen' as their main medium, then they will at some point echo 'the message' to others. No "HEAR YEE, HEAR YEE!" is needed any more. One magic key word serves as a trigger: NEWS. Being it in the papers, on the radio or via any 'screen', it draws in the attention of human beings. And even though I kicked out the TV and radio channels (years ago), do not read papers, avoid magazines and do stay away from any kind of so called 'news' sites, I still cannot seem to escape the viral 'C' madness. It is understandable that 'we' as human beings have a tendency to be alert on signals that there is a possible danger. When the music stops and the volume becomes louder in intensity, we tend to listen more carefully. And then when it is totally silent, followed by very serious sounding voice telling us that it is 'the NEWS' of today, then we are all attention. (Pavlov would have been so proud of us for proving our predictable behavior patterns like that.) Sometimes we do tend to forget that we are also animals and that most of us like to live in a herd. And we also want to survive, it is all part of our animal instinct. No need for the grey mass of our brain to be using energy when we are in a state of fear. Who would want to solve a mathematical puzzle while there is some danger about? In a state of survival human beings go back to most basic rules of their animal state of mind: freeze, flee and or fight. Any group of power crazy fellow psychopath humans and their sycophants (system whores) know how to manipulate this state of survival. But for that to happen 'it' needs a system of mind control, that 'it' can use to induce a constant state of fear. To control the media is to control the masses, it is quite simple actually.
If this dogmatic collectivist system can determine, from a central point of control, what the masses get to see, hear and as a result feel, then it will become a bundled force. This bundle can do absolutely horrible things, where people afterwards will claim that they did not know and they 'just' followed orders. This is not just a nazi system, this is still a reality, it will always be a risk. That kind of fascism now has people believe that they should take the injection(s), for any kind of reason. And the word 'voluntary' actually has 'reward' or 'punishment' attached to it. This is not a reality where critical observers, who think substantively and express themselves freely are welcome. And that is where I get to the reason how it is even possible that these individuals (and the groups they are part of) actually can get silenced in the first place. At work here is a phenomena that is the power of the silencing spiral. If the mass media channels (also the Big-Tech so called 'social' ones) are biased, stating they will only allow some 'official' bla-bla-bla, then that has a huge impact on the people actually taking this all in as 'the truth'. Even if it is the biggest lie in the history of human kind, when being indoctrinated with it on every channel they visit they will accept it as an illusionairy truth. But one key element is essential in this brain washing and mind control proces: FEAR! And it has to be constant, but not all the time, because at one point people will get used to it. Like for example during the bombings of London during World War 2, at some point people picked up their lives again. This is also part of Human behavior, we adapt to challenges and make the best of it again. So, be aware of 'the NEWS' giving you a moment to re-catch your breath in this whole so called 'pandemic', as just when you are getting confident walking around with a naked face again... BAM! (Best to expect 'it' coming anyway and to move on with your life, I think.) It is about trying to break people their free born and living spirit.
Yeah, but 'people like me' who refuse any participation into the global 'scientific' experiment, they become aware of 'the news', right? Sure, because controlling the mass media channels is a key element, but what use is there if nobody is hooked to it? And there are many who are part of that 'free' thing and what they experience as part of their social life is attached to it. We are herd animals and as such we communicate also to prevent us from getting hurt or killed by any (believed) danger. What if the biased mass media tells us there is danger, danger and danger. It shows us disturbing videos, let us hear crying witnesses and have us read 'the stories' of terror. Then our alert system will move up to the highest level, right? We might get some breathing space in between, but at some point it will get our attention again and induce even bigger, more horrible fear. "Did you not hear, people are dropping dead in the streets!" 'News' about yet another more killing virus variant and some people put on a face nappy again. Not because they want to protect 'the others', forget it, people in a strong state of fear are egoistic as the plague. So do not wear those nappies because you think it is about acting solidair towards those in fear of getting sick and dying. Have you ever seen people in masses getting into a state of panic? They will walk over others, they will push them over, walk over dead bodies on the ground as if they were not there. They do not do that on purpose mind you, but it is a state of mind, one to survive, by all means. Those people are incapable to think clearly, they only are able to freeze, flee and or fight. Therefore I do not blame them at all, they cannot help themselves to behave like that, they are actually supposed to do so (driven by their animal instinct). Yet I do blame those who induce this on purpose, the megalomaniac psychopaths and their sycophants (system whores).
But those in fear will report to others what is going on. They echo 'the News', the horror, the terror, especially to the hesitant and the skeptics. As they need to see, hear and of course feel, just like everybody else! It could even go as extreme as "Comply or die!" And I am prepared for any kind of crazy clown world coming up next. The strength of those who want to divide and rule, for some reason, is not only to control the mass media channels, but also to be able to mess with people their perception of reality. Where peer pressure will do the rest within the human herd. As human beings are herd animals by nature, they depend on groups and other individuals for survival, they do not prefer to end up in some kind of social isolation. This is quite a high peer pressure put on every individual, especially if a large group believes what they are being fed the whole bloody day by the biased mass media channels (including the so called 'social' ones). Some individuals fall for the peer pressure of risking social isolation very quickly. Others might do so because of a risk analyses. They might lose their income if they do not comply, for instance. It does not mean they will start to echo the message of terror themselves though. And some will comply because they want some of their 'given' liberties back. There are reasons for many to either comply or decline. Not everybody is a fanatic in that. "Wearing a mask, no big deal, if it makes others feel better, why not." But at the same time a parent of a child that is afraid of ghosts would not show to be afraid of ghosts too. It does not make sense to me, to claim it is solidarity. Those who are afraid and have a false belief in wearing a mask might safe them from getting sick are not helped by others wearing one too, it just will confirm their fear, making the drama even worse.
Now there is some little evil gnome in the United States of America, who apparently gained world fame. In a video that I came across, he dared to claim that an attack on him could be considered an attack on science. Of course the sycophant of the TV channel was giving him all the time to puke his propaganda onto the public. And in the meantime self censoring about what that little evil science goblin actually was attacked about. It was about him knowing where 'the virus' probably emerged from. The Wuhan institute of virology might have been the source of 'the virus', as it might have escaped from there. That is why all concerning this little bugger probably now is renamed using Greek numbers. So, at some point humanity will forget that it might have been created in a Bio Safety Level 4 lab in Wuhan China. And that it was done so as a part of the Gain Of Function research, that is conducted in several laboratories across the world. Financed by... The taxpayers of the USA, through the NIH {National Institute of Health} of which the little attack evil science goblin is part of (NIAID to be precise, since 1984). Yes, I known the lab in Wuhan did not get the money directly from the NIH (USA Taxpayers). They made a U-turn construction for that. Where the Eco-Health foundation was the cover up. That one gets 3.7 million USA dollar funding every year, of which it then gave 600'000 dollar to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And that lab collaborated with at least one University in Texas (USA). You know what virus type they were gaining functionality for? Ah come on, it is not that hard to guess, right? They even send some of them over to a certain lab in the USA to be experimented with. YES, it is about (beta) Corona viruses that can be found in bats in Wuhan China. Now, what could go wrong when trying to make viruses more deadly, faster spreading and what not? Guess who is a huge fan and supporter of that so called Gain Of Function research? YES, that little goblin who wants to have everybody injected with an experimental synthetic mRNA virus.
And the Eco-Health foundation, now that has a lovely name right? Well, it is going to be used for creating a library of active viruses of the most deadly kind. NOW WHAT COULD GO WRONG, RIGHT? But, anyway, this wont get through to those who think that little evil-science gnome is a kind of savior. Sure, wear three masks! Next up de Lambda variant, or the Zeta and what not. It never ends that way, well maybe, probably somewhere in 2050... Why? Well, because this might as well be a natural phenomena that is being abused to scare the shit out off people. And you known if you deny those who get ill proper medical treatment, well, then most of them most likely will die, actually. Especially the vulnerable elderly who are already close to their end of life span. This is actually what the death count proofs over here in Nederland. On average, most people that were claimed to have died because of 'the virus', are somewhere in their early 80's. The rest is also like the 'normal' statistic death rate in the country that I live in. What is abnormal is that governments keep counting the dead people they claim are virus related. While in Nederland the epidemic ended in may 2020 and another one began in september of that year. Too many anomalies there. And there is this other thing. In 1920 the earth its population was about 2 billion, in 2020 that was close to 8 billion. A growth of 6 billion over a 100 year span. There was an extreme birth explosion in 1946, triggered by the end of World War 2 in 1945. Anyway, the people born back then wont live for ever. Just add 80 to 1946 and you can expect a large amount of people dying somewhere between 2024 and 2028. By the year 2050 the earth population will have become less grey, meaning we will have a relative younger population than currently. In Nederland, Europe, there are 13.4 percent 70+ aged people in our society, at the time of publishing. Of those 2.3 million seniors about 1 million will die somewhere around this year, or the next. Sounds awful, I know, but it is the natural end of a life span. (Unfortunately in many cases caused by one of more (age) related diseases, like: longue infections, sepsis, cancer, heart and vascular based, kidney and other organ failure and so on...)
If you understand that a growth of the earths population of 6 billion over a span of a 100 year comes down to 60 million on average per year, then you get it when lots of people die 75 to 83 years later. The higher the growth rate, the higher the death rate 80 years later. It makes sense right? As you and I are not to live for ever in our current state of being. (Me living in my own bonus years already, as I consider them to be.) Now, as we grow of age, we tend to degenerate at some point in time. This becomes more clear at a faster rate after a certain age. We even shrink as our bone cells die faster than news ones get created. To put it blunt, we have death build in our system. And as we go past 70 we become more vulnerable and can get more diseases, many of which might cause us to breath our last breath. This is a fact of life, and it can be proven that also our immune system is dropping in effectiveness fast. (Part of that is because our red bone marrow is turning to fat and we lose stem cells that way, which are important for our immune system.) Also because our DNA is losing information during cell division, it gets damaged beyond repair. This can lead to cells dividing like crazy and spreading all through our body, this is also known as cancer. But there is also a larger risk to sepsis, that is where our own immune system will attack our own body. Just look up who is at IC, at what age and with which kinds of diseases. Many of those are diseases that are now being known as a co-morbidity. And it seems like we, as human beings, have a higher risk of getting those when we pass the age of 70.
Now, I understand if you would be critical about what I have published in this article. That is okay with me. And I thank you for reading this, because it took me quite a long time to type, it will have taken some time for you to read as well. And I do not claim to own the truth, but there are too many anomalies for me to just let it pass by and keep my silence on. There have always been megalomaniac psychopaths and their sycophants (system whores) that want to rule the world. And I think it is very dangerous to believe that we now live in a time and age where this is not the case anymore. There is enough proof around to debunk that belief. This is not a far away from home show, as if we would not have that here at our place, where ever that is. It were those anomalies, the science that turned not out to be generic and the numbers that did not add up that made my alarm bells go off. There is a lot more that I could publish about this, as a lot of it stinks like rotten dead fish. But for now I'm done with it. As I see it there is a force trying to get full control over the earth and its population. It is dogmatic collectivism, as I see it ,and there is not much good coming from that. Just look at China and you might see a glimpse of the future ahead for all of us. Some might even like the idea, many will comply to it. But I think for the wrong reasons, caused by the biggest lie ever. If this is about a virus spreading, then it is a part of humanity, caused by the megalomaniac psychos. And I see them and their sycophants (system whores) being able to destroy humanity, if we let them go on with this. And I do not think that I am able to get the many to snap out off it. No, I do not believe I actually have any role in it all. But at least I got it out off my system by publishing my own critical observations, that fed my substantive thoughts and had me freely expresse them.
If you tolerate this, then your children will be next...
To be found on JoeTjoep.
