Those who have been paying attention and doing their own research by not simply following the narrative of government are the mainstream media, will know that most of what is reported as cases are not actually cases of illness, but are merely PCR test positive results. Even the PCR test itself is not to be used for diagnosis of illness, and the high cycle threshold being used will produce false positives. It appears that the mainstream might be slowly shifting their narrative to talk about false positives.
One of the first mainstream media outlets to cover the issue PCR test was the New York Times in the article titled Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. it is a good job explaining the current characterized fraud. Some PCR testing even returned positive for swabs of fruits. It really is something that shouldn't be used and only serves to create the fear and hysteria over cases of positive test results that they pretend our actual illnesses.
The development of the rapid testing antigens proved to be even more ridiculous and produce even more false positives. You can find videos online of people doing rapid testing on coke soft drinks for example. It really is ridiculous, and probably more flawed than PCR testing.
Now, if you dared to talk about the reality of the flaws in the PCR test, and all the false positives they are creating through the high cycle threshold, or talk about the rapid antigen tests and their false positives, it would likely be censored on social media and treated as though you didn't know what was real. The efforts at censorship, as set forth by the Event 201 scamdemic pre-planning scenario, ensured that all efforts would be made to suppress information that they didn't want people to have access to. Even though it's true, big tech doesn't want you to be able to talk about it because it's not part of the official narrative they want you to know about.
However, leaked emails seen by the Guardian show that senior officials are now considering scaling back the widespread testing of people without symptoms, due to a growing number of false positives.
That's right, here's another mainstream article talking about the reality of the flaw in using PCR testing to try to diagnose people with an illness. Even though this is been known for decades as the inventor himself said you can't use this test to diagnose an illness. But that didn't stop them from perpetuating this fraud.
The accuracy of rapid coronavirus tests and how they should be deployed have been the focus of months of debate in the UK. The proportion of false positives – people incorrectly told they have the virus – increases when the prevalence of the disease falls. This happens because although the number of true positives is falling, the tests produce roughly the same number of false positives – meaning the proportion of incorrect results becomes greater.
It means thousands of people could be wrongly told to self-isolate and miss out on earnings or education due to inaccurate results. The government has advised anyone who tests positive with a rapid test to take a follow-up PCR test and self-isolate until they receive a negative result – but some experts have said this process is too slow and that a second lateral flow test would be as likely to produce the correct result.
Hope those who believe in the mainstream official narrative will come across this information and start to connect some dots what they've been missing for a year. When you go get a PCR test, the only thing they're testing for his genetic material. They are not testing for a virus itself. That means the genetic material could be from something else. Further, if it is the virus, it could be fragments of broken down virus or inactive virus. In addition, even if you do have some active virus in you, that just means you have some of the virus in you, not that you are sick, or will be sick. As such, you won't be spreading the virus since asymptomatic spreading is a more of a myth than a reality, as respiratory viruses are spread mostly through symptoms that expel the virus from the body.
But it's been great for business.
“Everyone in England can now access rapid testing twice a week, in line with clinical guidance. Rapid testing detects cases quickly, meaning positive cases can isolate immediately, and figures show that for every 1,000 lateral flow tests carried out, there is fewer than one false positive result.”
At 10 pounds per test, with people being tested twice a week in the ridiculous Operation Moonshot, it's cost millions of dollars over the past year to produce nothing close to real results of the threat of a virus. It's only serve to promote we fear over the per valence of the virus by claiming that these are actually people who are infected when they probably aren't, and claiming that there will when they aren't, and claiming that they are a threat to public safety when they aren't.
