Gave the video 6 minutes of my time. It did not surprise me that plants would love a carbon rich atmospere. Perhaps they talked about it later in the video but you can have things as carbon rich as you want, yet without water the plants are not going to do well no matter how carbon rich the atmosphere. Mars is a good case in point.

The increase in global temperature will see more dust bowel like conditions. Part of Syria's original problems are said to have been from abnormal dry conditions which effected farming and the migration to the cities from the rural areas.

Are you suggesting that there is a downside to reducing our carbon emissions? Even if the science is shaky the downside of reducing carbon emissions is hard for me to see. Electric cars seem better to me than fumes spewing ones. Solar, hydro and wind electricity seem better than that generated at coal burning generators.

Is there something that is going over my head?