It was an interesting writeup. Some facts, some sensationalism, a little too heavy on the politics though, and nobody being honest can predict the future. Seems to pander to one side/market. If you're trying to save the world, including the others who typically reside outside this market would be wise, since this market would already be well versed; hearing what they already know/think they know.
The media has failed the people who consume it, on all fronts. I've been studying both sides since it started, never choosing to be on one. An observer. Best to look the threat in the eye, and it has two. It's almost like a clash between two polar opposites is being enforced, maintained, and at some point, possibly, maybe, shit could hit the fan; if it ever fully leaves the internet. Those not under the spell would simply watch a problem take care of itself, in a sense.
What happens to this entire situation if people on all sides simply stopped looking at their screens? That's something I've been thinking about for the past few months.
RE: End Game