RE: RE: .
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: .

Words
185
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y

I 100% believe this project means no harm. It's just a very delicate balancing act. What started with just one turned into several front ends that all inherited one of the platform's biggest blunders. When you see onboarding attempts for Hive or a new tribe, what are they seeking? Content creators, or content consumers? Because they push to only attract creators, the creators outnumber consumers, and because of that, what's being created more often than not goes unnoticed. They show up, they leave. No market; no consumers. Revolving door, everyone scratching their heads, wondering what's wrong...

Well, it's very simple. Content is nothing without consumers. Do even more to eliminate consumers and even less to attract them, kinda like what we're doing here, and yes, of course, we'll be running into problems.

Consumers, these days, spend a lot of their own money on content online. This platform offers them a better deal than some of the largest corporations on the planet, straight out the box. We squander that potential, tell nobody, and pay people to look away? That just seems a bit off to me.

@nonameslefttouse: I 100% believe | Ecency