Would you throw a fit, start acting childish, and make nonsensical claims about how you think I'm attempting to stop this information from spreading, if I downvoted, because the instance of actual content isn't located here?

It's just confusing for me. Is Hive not good enough to get the actual video? All Hive gets is the video description, and I assume you expect full value here, for less than a half-assed effort? This approach doesn't bring value, it strips value, but I assume you'd argue your mere presence here is something we should all bow down to so therefore you feel entitled, even if this approach of yours is a ripoff?

It's not like I want to take candy from a baby and deal with the whining I'm certain I'd have to put up with if I downvoted and offered a legitimate reason; a reason that would be ignored and converted into something dramatic and pitiful.

I just think if you want to earn here, placing the instance of actual content here would be the most logical step and would be far more consumer friendly. Would you like to talk about this first? The reason I said all this first is because the last guy acted so petty and pathetic, over a downvote, after taking the same approach as you, and it was explained clearly as to why, yet he somehow managed to spin the entire incident in a way that made me think he was mentally ill and needed more help than the advice I was offering. I wasn't prepared nor qualified to deal with someone who had so many instability issues going on all at once.

My point is there's no instance of actual content here, so therefore, this is a ripoff.

Your thoughts: