Constructive suggestions?
How many times do I have to repeat myself?
The entertainment industry generates billions annually. Consumers spend money on entertainment, all the time. This platform gives them something in return.
For instance, many content producers ask for donations. The consumer donates. They throw that money away. They give $20 here, $100 there and each time that money is gone, forever. They tip people, and that money is gone, forever.
Consumers can come here, spend less, and donate or tip for more, over time, plus get a return on the money spent on entertainment. Then if they ever decide they're done, they get their money back, plus some, all while the content producers still managed to earn.
If the world and their billions spent on entertainment knew about this business model, we wouldn't need investors or speculators. Just regular folks who spend money on entertainment anyway, would create tremendous buy pressure on any token involved.
You have one on stage and a venue with many seats. You want those seats full. You don't want one or two individuals purchasing all the seats.
You want to challenge me with business, I'll blow your doors off.
"Be postive!"
https://steemit.com/life/@nonameslefttouse/it-might-be-worth-less-but-it-s-not-worthless
https://steemit.com/life/@nonameslefttouse/i-feel-broken-probably-a-bad-time-to-take-a-break
And I could keep going and going and going.
You're sitting here focused on downvotes because you're wasting time going nowhere and in a circle. Some don't like that, and you go downvoting them back in retaliation, then come here acting like some hotshot innocent big shot Mr. Postive. Soon enough the rest of your cult will show up and we can have one big party.
Telling me to be positive. You being positive comes across as disingenuous because I've been watching how you've been acting here for a long time, haven't been impressed, and I said nothing.
Do you know why some of the same voters can be seen voting for a lot (not all) of trending content?
Because they're the ones actually giving this curation stuff a chance. They're the ones actually voting for content they think is worthwhile. If more stepped up to the plate, there'd be more variety and more names on the the voter lists. How many times have people asked you to step outside of your social circle and contribute beyond that circle? Too many.
Of course those actually curating will be able to push content to the top. That's how the system is designed. Is it perfect now? Nope. But it certainly has improved.
"Be positive" says the guy only focused on downvotes all while ignoring the positive work being done with upvotes when it's those upvotes that could help potentially draw billions of dollars to this platform if people would just stop, think, and pull their heads out of their assess.
I come here on my own, to speak to you about my views, and you continue to act like I'm some part of a "lobby", after I had already told you I'm not part of this. If people want to vote for my stuff, fine, and I'm pretty damn sure everyone here works towards gaining support so if that makes me a bad guy, you're head might be screwed on, but clearly, it's on there backwards.
So how much more do I have to say before you throw a hissy fit and start abusively downvoting me like you do to others, all while sitting here acting like the bees knees and cat's meow. The one with all the answers.
And no, I don't even know the guy you enjoy bullying with your downvotes. I checked your info on Steemworld because I had a feeling you were hiding something.
RE: Another post about downvotes