The most of experts are waiting the appearance of new blockchain platform that was made by the well-known scalable architect from China - Xiang Ying. He and his team decided to invent the improved system that will solve many actual problems of existing ecosystem protocols. The Chinese team has not already presented their offspring but the Chinese developers and their advisors promise to introduce the society with their masterpiece up to the end of the certain year. What “pros” and “cons” the innovative project has?
All known information gives opportunity to name the project as a perspective one with the domination of advantages. But some minuses also are. What are the main features of the platform?
The blockchain project has a name “MultiVAC” and its unique system has a raw of advantages:
The sharding concept that provides to the platform the possibility of
decentralization;
The parallelism of different options that prevent the system drop;
DApps require high security can choose shards with a large number of nodes and high consensus security thresholds;
The project has a really high performance (tens of thousands of TPS).
“MultiVAC” provides developers with the most important feature of blockchain items - flexibility to select the application of underlying computing resources. All such resources are based on a trusted probability model. The project has the original applications that permit to users a really high throughput. Any operations speeds are faster and guaranteed successful.
Also the system has a mechanism for Smart Contract execution. All fees for the contracts running are charging automatically. MVM is set for these aims in the parameters of the “MultiVAC” concept.
What minuses have been already seen?
The experts say that the fundamental of platform is successful but it is difficult to estimate the perspectives of future ecosystem because of lack of information. The executive team asks all stockholders keep an eye on the project’s Telegram, but for now there is a really little lab data about processing.
So the first disadvantage is – the lack of lab information. If we are speaking about the second imposing minus – it is the closed Github of the project. Many users want to be informed about the code features that can be seen in the Github. If the founders open the total data about platform’s source code management, there will be more wishing customers up to the long-awaited presentation and tokens sale in the 1st decade of the following year.
