Often we meet people who disconnected or disconnected disconnected even if not disconnected to connect. Such is the incident that makes irritation in adding insight. There are many things that these people tend to limit themselves to learning new things.
There is a contradiction between studying science and the science of religion. Simply put, we can look at this picture. There are two types of thinking. Between thinking scientifically with religion. We all know that humans have a special brain capacity compared to other brains. But not all of them want to add brain contents with new insights. Tend to be complacent with simple knowledge even though it turns out he also did not know anything.
Various attitudes shown by many people in rejecting various things. Among them is because of foreign matter, because it does not enter logic and because there is prohibition or his / her internal challenge.
We have the right to add unlimited insights. The ability of our brain is more qualified to do so. Then find the case. The contradiction between studying science that does not exist in religious teachings. It is basically a religion that rules a group sulking into a deity system. Every religion has a handbook called a book. All people who enter into a particular religion are required and always invited to follow what is written in the manual.
We need to be aware, that science develops every second. While the teachings of religion so-so just since patented. The book of religion is not the source of all knowledge because it is incomplete without empirical evidence. But we can make it as a study too. So, in fact, religion is a matter in the inside (personal). The rest is science. Religion is regarded as the truth internally. Science is an external truth. The meaning of truth is a collective agreement of a group. So the internal truth only applies to the group alone and the external truth applies to all.
Studying religion and science is everyone's right. We study religions together while studying science. Although indeed when we add to science will find many things that are contradictory. But this should not be a great wall to limit ourselves to new knowledge. Okay you are Muslim, you are christian, you konghucu, you buddha. You all every day must learn science. In addition to learning science, you also use science. The simplest example is, shave the hair. No shaving hair wear religion. Existing shaved hair instead shavers. This shaver is the science product you use for your life.
Religion is an inner affair, while science is your need in daily life. Just as you use social media. You share the teachings of religion through social media. But social media is not taught in religion.
The book of religion is not the source of all knowledge. Science is divided into many separate fields. Studying your earthquakes learn geology, geography, biology, physics, chemistry. But if you just learn from religion, the answer is easy to guess, "god power" is deh. Studying the science of finance, would require knowledge such as accounting, economics, sociology and other applied sciences. It is true in the book of religion is also a matter of science but it should be remembered also that every second of science continues to grow. In the teachings of religion may only base it but need to be developed to find better pemahan. So it is not just an answer to God. Such people are so clear that science is superficial. Because he does not know anything. Like Usro asked you, but you do not know the answer, you say "only Yanto know". The value of your answer 0 (zero) alias does not answer.
In science, if you find there is a mistake, you can get a nobel prize. Or a small example, if you find an error on google, you'll get a reward. Turning upside down if you find an error in religious teachings, you will be considered infidel or blasphemy. But it is clearly different context. Return to personal truth points with common truth. So it is true that religion has nothing to do with science. Even religion is a science product, too. Yes, science is the product of human intelligence. Here comes the debate. The ambiguous quotes that claim that science must be of religion are only empty. What is clear is that you have the right to study religion and science.
Here I do not discredit religion or science. But invites all of us to be willing to accept new things that certainly to understand it we must learn more. Distinguish between the trusted and the learned.
