It's interesting to read all the opinions on this topic. In my particular case, I became familiar with Hive, Steemit, and Blurt years ago, long before I started here. However, my decision was to start on this blockchain and not on the others because I knew that here the content itself is valued more. During these five years I have gone through many transitions, Web3 platforms (SocialFi) where you earned money by creating content and interacting came and went without fanfare. My content, on the other hand, has been in a constant process of development and evolution.
Honestly, I think that publishing the same content on several similar platforms/blogs is a complete waste of time. If you truly consider yourself a content creator, you must know that each platform is unique, no matter how similar they may seem. But that's not all; it's also important to consider that a creator must vary their content for all types of audiences and not always repeat the same thing. I can't simply repeat one of the many reviews I wrote last year. There will always be something that changes over time, and the sites and communities vary.
Also, the idea of replicating the same content for a "double reward" is absurd, since Hive has proven that there are many opportunities to generate extra and diversified income without having to go somewhere else. Those who publish on Hive, Steemit, and Blurt are simply people who prefer a few extra cents to doing proper research and finding excellent projects and alternatives in this vast ecosystem.
RE: Should we Curate & Support People that Copy&Paste Content to Steemit & Blurt?