I think there's a little bias here, Sir! Showing a list of donors that doesn't include private donors or donations to and from Political Action Groups renders the data displayed beyond useless in any impartial debate. There is no Meta, nor Musk and/or X on that list.

You also suggest that Google are able to negatively affect Trump's chances because of their huge donation but yet, happily praise the Polymarket data being pushed by known Trump supporter, Musk through his own social media company.

Also no mention of possible Russian interference, who if the news were to be believed, interfere in every country's elections and they of course would want Trump to win.

It's moderately interesting to watch from afar and look at the huge number of permutations of future world events caused by the result but if I'm honest, I don't care enough. None of them are likeable nor appear honest and as usual, it's all about the size of wallets.

Thank you for always being a great read.

I hope you're having a good weekend and best wishes as always to you and your loved ones