This report starts out on the wrong foot, and an error you have then duplicated is to confuse the reader from the very beginning.
Cover page of the report....

Then, page 1,

Is the report about all Covid-19 vaccines or just the mRNA ones? If its just the mRNA vaccines, none of this should apply to the Astra Zeneca, which in my opinion is the one to worry about. (personal and unsubstantiated view only!)

The rest of the report continues this theme of befuddlement which is such a shame as there is a lot of interesting food for thought and further reading.

This type of schoolboy error in presenting data, or deliberate attempt to obfuscate information always puts me into distrust mode, and then I have to fight off applying personal bias!

The other huge issue I have with the presentation of any data concerning medicine and pharmaceuticals is that no one appears to distinguish between social healthcare and private healthcare. Arguments applied to one, will often not apply to the other but it's rare for any distinction to be made.

When there is so much information out there for people to consider which will allow them to make more informed decisions on any subject, I think it's so important to make clear the aims and define the objectives and methodology clearly.

Instead of my mind chewing over the information, I'm debating whether it's misinformation or false information.

Hope you're well and having a great weekend. Best wishes as always to you :-)