It is absolutely not fair use as it is being monetised! And I stand by my opinion that you are doing nothing more than spinning other peoples work to farm rewards!
I have no influence on how others vote and I think you are insulting them if you think they cannot make up their own mind. Others have downvoted you a lot in the past I have just seen, is that due to my 'harassment' too?
but I have been attacked for 250-600 words posts with high reward
Reward disagreement is a grey area but I downvoted you primarily because of you simply reposting someone else's work! You add zero opinion, zero additional value and then try to make it sound acceptable by posting a 'disclaimer'!
You are monetising and making money from someone else's work and that is wrong. It's that simple. You said before you have been a member for a long time. You know what you're doing but are now attempting to look like the injured party.
Don't forget that rewards are not yours until they are in your wallet. Anyone here can choose what to upvote or downvote, it's the very basis on which this blockchain is founded.
I did not give you a black mark against your name. We are all judged by what we post. Take some personal responsibility.
If you genuine wished to share someone else's work, then why not decline or limit reward? Post a link using 
Please cut the BS and talk straight. You're here to farm the rewards and make money. You follow a curation trail with an auto voter that votes after the optimal 4m30s, you don't comment or read anyone else's posts! So at least be straight up about it.
So now we know where we stand. Community matters here. They decide. Not me, or Marky or anyone else. None of us are 'owed' anything here.
Post nice pictures of whales with some personal commentary, I might upvote. Post zero effort, spun Cointelegraph articles, I might downvote. Thats how its going to be.
As for what you do, that's your choice too, such is the beauty of this blockchain we are both using.
Seriously, have a great lunch break. I miss Greggs!
RE: DEleted