(I can see no relationship between the problem of posts' quality and funds being locked in Steem power) Anyway, funds being locked away for 2 years is good news for serious investors - it inspires confidence

We need to be aware that the quality of posts is dependent on the human factor, not the system. There is no such thing as "an incentive system that honors thoughtfulness".

It's an interesting demonstration how close-minded those guys are.

I guess you've accidently pasted your private key in the tag field. If so, consider resetting your password ASAP.

With the new UX design, is there a way to make the active key different from the posting key? We've been told that having the same password for both posting/curating and handling funds is a bad idea, but

I thought Steem was about upvoting content, not a person behind it.

@stino-san, this has little to do with the quality of your post. Actually I quite liked your introduction and I would have upvoted it. What I wanted to point out, is this dangerous habit of 'me too' voting.

I hate to spoil the party, but $1600 for a simple introduction looks quite ridiculous, while other valuable inputs are barely noticed.

My bad, I should have checked the content of your wallet before using your name. I'll amend the text, as you are indeed a different case and it might be confusing - you are an author who has a high expected