Yes it's very unlikely they will go broke. Only way they will go broke if they just get on drugs in which they'd probably die taking more drugs than they can handle before they die and still die rich haha. The other option is they just give all their wealth away. The way the structure of the system is rigged it's unlikely they'll go broke from overleveraging. Assuming risk has often times made them richer because it diversified their corporate holdings. So buying everything and everybody it becomes harder to go broke that way.

People like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey when it comes to the government they are two sides of the same coin. For them to go broke the us government would have to collapse more than likely. Even threats to break up social media doesn't really work because often times people aren't going to go okay i opt to use the second best social media site lol

It just doesn't quite work that way in social media. How people use social media is weird to me. I'd think they'd figure out that hey i'm not going to pay you all for something i contribute to on this scale. We should all own the social media interfaces we use.

They rather keep enriching these particular people or others which is odd but we have to factor that human psychology and behavior doesn't have to follow a logical pattern lol. Which is why we can even end up in situations where the world has mark zuckerbergs and jack dorseys which i feel especially in their sector they shouldn't exist. However they still do.

So i don't think its a question so much of can they go broke. I think it's more of a question of why do we keep enriching them. Why are we so determined to make sure these people control over half of all the resources. Then we double down and come to crypto and do the same thing because its not enough for us that they already control everything in the standard economy. We're now hell bent on making sure they do that in here as well lol.