Well i believe it's going to always be a big flaw in hive because i don't think it was meant to work on a capitalistic system. I'll explain if you look at the early conversations of Dan Larimer and Ned Scott. it's evidence that suggest they felt like it would be all this free creation of money and velocity of money.

They really felt the whales and many of the participants would look at it like oh this is like we're creating money from nothing and it's getting in everyones hands. So a guy could make one post that would net him thousands of dollars. That one guy may be good as far as earnings for the entire year.

The problem is the key conceprt of these dpos systems seem to revolve around social media integration and participation. This is different from platforms that are more money based like bitcoin or xrp was. However the problem with social media was it was always to a great degree meant to be the participants being the most valuable resources.

So the misconception is that you look at something like facebook for example and well hey you don't make anything there. Why wouldn't everyone come to like something like hive or dpos. That's an incorrect understanding of how social media and networks work. They don't work like membership sites in the sense you pay to play. So something like facebook value wise is much more valuable than something like hive because of it's great communication reach and it's free to the user atleast in idea. The currency in this case isn't the us dollar. The currency is attention value.

The problem is hive doesn't have enough attention value to matter. So what i'm saying to you is that facebook does pay it's users a tremendous amount of value it's just not in currencies like the us dollar. However the attention of these social media companies that pay billions of dollars into servers annually do translate to value going back to you. So obviously you won't have the actual reach on hive such as companies and individuals gain value from on the instagrams and twitter.

In Hive's case they pay you really actual money but it's so insignificant to most people it's not worth the time. Even when i go on blogs it's the same blogs of the same people all the time. It's not alot of new blogs and authors that i'm not familiar with. When i log in i already know who i'm expecting to see and meet. So that suggest to me it's probably first off a small group of people with the skillset who can even write proper blogs and articles which now means you've condensed this down to a skilled occupation. Which is not going to be very valuable unless you have a great amount of people reading the articles which i don't think that's going to happen with the oversaturation of free information all over the internet.

So the only way i think the problem gets solved of making this anykind of viable solution beyond just a small crevice someplace. Would depend on a freemium service model. Now there are many smart developers around here that could build a system an ai that does that intuitively. Bitcoin MYK is a system that rewards on posts without the interaction of a human, although humans can upvote posts manually. I don't think it should be necessary for you to receive upvotes etc.,

It's never going to be enough incentive in upvoting other peoples content and so that's going to stagnate the process. So eventually some freemium service free blockchain is going to come along and just do it better. Unless you have something again like a second layer solution like bitcoin myk. However hive is i think likely going to be too slow to catch on to many of the issues in association with this.

As far as classes go. I think it's enough resources on the planet which points to another flaw in hive and how hive is as an economic model many times worse than the standard economy so it's not even close to a solution with it's distribution rate and concentration of wealth and influence.

Influence is the problem. HIve should have been developed as a bonded system. Meaning investors receive competitive interest rates each year for their stakes without the influence of their hive power. that's how bitcoin myk works. On the platform itself everyone starts out the same. You can only earn based on your level of participation not making money off other people. That's why capitalism is slavery and this idea about who won't work who wants free stuff and who doesn't. The problem is capitalist i would question to what degree they work because their entire model is based on making money off the backs of other peoples labor. In any system we'd call that slavery if you earn off the back of someone else. Pope Innocent introduced this modern concept of capitalism as a means to enslave certain groups of people. It's slavery and it's wrong. Somehow we been brainwashed to believe its a good thing, lol.

Just to illustrate how evil it is. So we're clear on this and no misunderstandings. We're moving now into the age of the robot economy. This is a real economic term. Now what this means is the robots will perform much of the labor. So for those who wanna go well the poor lazy people don't wanna work and nothing is free will have to recant that. Most of the labor like we're seeing now will be performed by a robot. So that issue will be a nonissue.

However pay attention to this. Capitalism is so evil and the influence system that was poorly designed by Dan Larimer which he later regretted very much he had made a mistake and underestimated it but learned.it was wrong and he stated so. In this evil idea rich people and power players will try to control all the ip's and tech of these robots to still enslave other people by taking al ltheir land and resources and enslaving them the very same way. Will have nothign to do with work or people trying to fight for rights and benefits they may or may not deserve.

Watch when i tell you these same greedy people who even manifest themselves on hive. YOu got these richer capitalist whales on hive that have this same disgusting mindset because either they don't know any better or are just idiots. Are playing that role now that will be played in teh future. WE live now in an age of abundance for the most part we always have. This is all a creation and machinations you all fall for that is baloney. Now i'm not saying there isn't a degree of advancement and incentive that was needed several hundred years ago. The system naturally developed through it. However i am saying now it's not necessary.

I've pretty much lost all hope in the blockchain as far as spearheading this. The blockchain will have a role to play however right now companies like Meta or facebook i think will stumble on to this age of abundance with the metaverse and creating a new value system and jobs on teh metaverse they hiring even now thousands upon thousands of virtual workers with all skillsets to work in the metaverse. Hive you gotta have a skill for the most part that is a highly developed skill to write. Most of the population won't have that. In the metaverse you can have a guy who's a ticket salesman or tour guide. So thats going to be development i dont think the blockchain is able to do yet. I don't think they have the resources or the focus so its far off for the chain in the beginning maybe later it will feel the gaps. however now it's failed to do that.