Well the problem fabian is you all still ignore what people like Vitalik think about chain's like Hive. It's not that they ignore it. It's that you all ignore what is said. I'll give you an example. Vitalik would say the consensus mechanism for Hive is a security issue. He would say Ethereum is not cost effective and efficient but it is more secure. He'd then raise the point of view that in the end security will trump efficiency.

Now i don't necessarily agree with that. I agree with the needs of the people should surpass any theoretical blockchain philosophies. In other words if it's what the people want it is correct. It is similar to saying the market is always right or the customer is always right.

The problem is neither Vitalik nor the Hive community listens to anybody. Thats the problem and that's why Hive is ranked almost 200 and although eth is high ranked it's needing to make many adjustments to it's system because it as well hasn't listened to the will of the people.

If you listen at Elon Musk he would say the problem is in ownership distribution as it will always hurt decentralization in the most important sense. The next part is so based on what is correct and what is not what actions are taken. Well eth is sitll very highly ranked so despite it's inefficiency the will of the people is still in line with ethereum. That can change but it is neither here nor there if it doesn't change all that matters is that the people decide it's more useful to them in some way to do that.

I feel like the hive community won't listen because the whales in complacency with their regular upvote earnings don't feel a sense of urgency to change anything and the rest of the community loses the benefits of advancement. As they are in complacent in earnings. People like Marky Mark.

Finally i'll say this. Projects like i head up bitcoin myk and bbd coins. I believe to the point of view like Elon Musk maybe even Vitalik to a degree as he's on record of funding projects like ours. I think the most secure network would be the one where the ownership ratio looks the best. I think that's just obvious. So i think projects like ours would achieve better distribution maybe not in the beginning but in the end and that would be more secure to the network. So it's a bit more complex than that. That's some of the idea of it.

The problem is we can sit up here for the next several years and talk about how good hive is. HIve is a 200 place coin. Hive gets better and better rankings when you all listen. How many of you are listening to me right now? I"m giving you good information but many will see this and ignore this. So it's not Vitalik who's not listening. I've watched almost every interview? Vitalik has done. Vitalik is well aware and he's outlined the issues for projects like Hive. If Hive wants to change that it starts with them listening.