My thing is this. If it was a resource issue that would be one thing. The earth can feed over 10 billion people. That's not a resource issue or even a logistical issue with all our technology. It's a political issue and that's the problem

People say they should have plenty and others shouldn't have anything based on what they do or whom they are. So it's something called the inheritance that Thomas Paine 300 years ago proposed 10% of it should go to the citizens dividend because those people that inherited that money didn't do anything either lol. So who's resources is it really to the point we get to decide who's deservant or not. i think it's easier just to invest in the people and the people give back returns collectively. this is a kinda asinine, futile approach to advancement because taskmaster wants to talk about innovation so okay we create a microwave that's a time machine as well through capitalistic innovation as that's suppossedly the goal.

However the people who bought the microwave don't have any food to put in the microwave because they got no money which is funny because 50 years ago when they didn't have the microwave they had more food to put in the microwave lol. So you teleport to the future hungry and the future has no food so what point does innovation make if you don't take care of the people lol.