Yes the better way is the earth can feed 10 billion people.. let the people eat if the resources are there, lol. I've seen animals in the law of the jungle. When a lion eats and he's had his fill. he moves aside and let's other animals partake of the meal lol.
He doesn't politically make up constructs about why it's a bad idea for another animal to eat. A wise philosopher once said " freedom starts at breakfast" Yes this is a very complex topic but i'd say maybe we should explore our idea of what freedom means and looks like. Some people how they define freedom in the outcome doesn't feel or look like freedom to me.
So i'd ask you to think about the parameters of freedom. What does it mean to be free? Does it mean to choose better tasting peanut butter to which we've invested billions to find .. or would that billions of dollars have better been spent on fighting cancer or disease or poverty and keeping us alive.
I only ask people to think. Maybe that is what freedom is but i think at the end of the day when you weigh everything reducing the most suffering will be the conclusion i have faith that most humans will reach. If i gotta stand up here for the next several decades and try to convince other humans that reducing suffering to all humans outweighs some idea or principle of defense of why i should be able to drive a lambo lol.. Then maybe that is wht freedom is.
Again i only ask people to go within and explore what it looks like and feels like to them in reality.
RE: Income or Redistribution Schemes?💵