Author of this content has low reputation.
RE: RE: I channelled Satan
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: I channelled Satan

mykos(-7)
Published in
ecoTrain
Words
731
Reading
4 min
5y

Yes Sarah, i think its easier to understand some of what you're saying like the example of the pirate, poet and king. This being is a king... no he's a pirate...well no he's a poet. I'm confused which one are they? Well we understand a person can be all three things and be the same person. We do it all the time. Another easier way i believe to think about it.

You have a big body of water. it empties into a stream.. or a creek or river. So what is it? Is it this big lake tahoe? or is it this little creek or stream? Well the body of water is the source of all the same thing and of the same substance. They could in all technicality be the same body of water. When we look at something like the concept of the god-man, or Yeshua.. gods with little g's or the big G as in the one entity.

This idea of the "One" source of all life. Is similar to the examples i gave earlier.. we call it nonduality. It is the recognition that the bodies of water never stopped being the same thing. The confusion is in identity. identity and ego are the cause of the same thing.. as they are the same thing but they are in essence a false idea. It's like saying are numbers real. Is there a such thing as three trees or maybe its just always one thing one tree one substance but for language purposes we distinguish.

I think the only actual differences are some people recognize this and others don't. When you don't recognize this you think as that. Although everything is addressed as the " i am" whatever you believe the " i am" to be. i am girl.. i am boy .. i am i am i am i am.

Here's another example. I am theatre actor. I do several performances a day. In the morning i play king lear. In the evening i play julius ceasar. The performances end and i go home as john smith. Which person am i? Well the truth is i'm always john smith. I was always john smith. In that instance i was ceasar i was king lear but they are many of the faces i wear.

The world is a stage and we're the many faces that God wears. In relation to Satan. There is quite the mistranslation of the idea of Satan. Satan means accuser he is a prosecutor. He is the contrarian right. if the idea of good and bad is used then Satan is the exemplifier of it. In our transcendant form like i learned to embrace there doesn't exist 2 options of good and bad but there actually exist 3 options.

You see i don't know good or bad, only humans know good and bad because they partook of the fruit of knowledge of good and bad. I know not such ways. I exercise option 3 which is i don't know. Makes it hard to judge. and judgement is not love.

The other stumbling block is many go well if you're a god or gods or God. Why does your power allow suffering and how is it justified. The problem is though you see an infinite being which is the source or the "One" that we speak of can't know suffering as an infinite being. Only a finite being can know the finite. The infinite is not even aware of the finite no more than i'm aware of when i step on the ground if i stepped on an ant. So an infinite being doesn't have emotions or feelings comparable to a finite being.

The infinite has to percipitate itself down to the finite.. the idea of the god man.. yeshua,, buddahs, great teachers lesser spiritual beings etc., etc., The only difference is when the being believes in the seperate self. if you don't accept the seperate self like i don't transcending many things becomes easier. In the dogma of religion and the idea or concept of good and bad lies the demiurge or the god of the material world who can use concepts like good and bad thats who came to you.

I think he came to you before this.. You need to give me a call you been under the influence of the dimurge lol.

@mykos: Yes Sarah, i | Ecency