In the year and two months that I have been on Hive Blockchain, not only have I seen a great difference in the blockchain I joined then compared to now, but also in terms of my own experience and comparison to any other blockchain outside of Hive.
As I started exploring communities to know which I would be able to fit in very well with my contributions, I noticed there was more to be done than just fitting in. Areas of engagement and constantly being on point in the aspect of what the community desires and expects from her members were a bit of a worry to me as I was being off and on. It was sometimes just dropping a quality post and coming back anytime, then dropping again, and then later on, most of those published would be curated.
Not just about writing a post randomly, it has to be a great and quality one coupled with the fact that the publisher must abide by the rules of the community in that there will be constant and continuous engagement in the aspect of commenting on post and replying to posts and comments, if the community has a token, need be that the publisher should have it still, if the community appreciates threading on social media handles like 
Inasmuch as this is of great importance for the growth of the publisher, it is likewise important to the community and hive blockchain at large, as growth is continuous and needed for the next level of the blockchain in a more positive way.
Obvious enough is the fact that the name is still Hive Blockchain, and apparently it hasn't changed either, just that there have been some upgrades in algorithms, and these are peculiar to the communities in charge. This undoubtedly has brought a notable change in the view of the blockchain by the users, preferrably the members of each of the communities, and the know-how of what the community needs and expects as time goes by. This is in respect to the vision and mission of the community, as no community wants to remain at the level they were at earlier in the day.
Following the recent published post on 
Seeing that the newly launched interface, which indeed is the Everything App, isn't just a mere joke or a downplay of what it stands to achieve not just now but in the future, is something quite impressive.
The unification that the project in hand, the interface, is set to achieve is something quite off, as it tends to not only yoke the communities and their members to itself but also the commitment, engagement, and pronouncement that the blockchain is set to have.
Now that one of the add ons relative to each of the community is the feature #thread, lets talk on the engagement base on the daily threads. A community, of course, which will have a moderator for the threads relative to such community, sees constant engagement from her users on the aspect of creating threads and upvoting them; this, on the other hand, has also raised the confidence of the threaders so they constantly thread and make the community thread engaging and quite cool to be in. This is also applicable to the normal writing of a post.
Also, on the aspect of backing up the engagement with the stacking of the community token, it is necessary that the users also adhere to that, thereby raising the relevance of both the token and the community at large.
At the tail end, the MAUs will increase.
Now that a new dimension of publishing posts has been taken by
