morir
@morirResource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2016-09-25 11:42
RSS Feed
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
Digging into people's personal affairs, whether on a blockchain or otherwise, may well involve facts, but that doesn't make it invasive and inappropriate, especially when no strong or ultimately meaningful
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
It nevertheless doesn't change the fact that your suggestion of the notion of @ozchartart being a random poster who got lucky is a straw man. I don't believe anyone has suggested it. I actually said "got
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
I have flagged this post as this is a witch-hunt that has no factual basis, only misguided speculation. The following is my explanation for why. one more thing -- this is absolutely false. With the exception
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
People who succeed in a system based on voting will often if not usually have some in-built source of voting support. It is absurd to suggest otherwise. to me this answer you gave to @kevinwong (about
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
Okay I misundertood. Nevertheless, it still appears to me you making overly-strong factual claims in your original post. That is not a good sign for witch-hunt post. With the exception of incorrectly assuming
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
Everything i said was absolutely provably true From OP: I was talking about the comment @berniesanders flagged. I said however, there were no lies in my comment. Everything i said was absolutely provably
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
Of course, that is your right. However there were no lies in my comment. Everything i said was absolutely provably true. Including the fact that him being an alt account was a possible interpretation of
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
I specifically stated in the comments to this post that this was an alt account for my main account @sigmajin. link to comment .. so I guess this account is more of a prop player than a shill. I had originally
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
incidentally, it seems to me that you wish to have your cake and eat it too. On one hand, if someone criticizes the quality of the work of one of your 'friends', you flag them because they must have ulterior
RE: $STEEM/BTC Daily Poloniex+Bittrex Technical Analysis / Market Report Update #166, Jan. 18, 2017.
it seems like it would be hard to implement on a blockchain... yours network had a similar idea, and it seemed to me tha tthey were just inviting people to work around it. I normally try not to pimp my
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
those were two really interesting ones, since especially mibenkito had a lot of controversy around her. But when you add it all up, the amount of money thats gone to accounts with a direct link to one
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
I want to make it clear that im not accusing you of any wrong doing. But right or wrong, there is a debate about NGC voting for OZ and it doesn't really seem like theyre strangers in the night (as most
RE: Who is Ozchartart, really? The real story behing the ozchartart controversy. (Sock Opera part 1)
However, (I love detective jobs ;)) what I found is @aizensou is connected to @bento @meiisheree and @mibenkito. Dude, you ruined my big reveal! I noticed the Aizen/bento/meiisheree/mibenkito thing too.