I think that there is my issue, something that you perceive to be a good thing; everyone has the same opportunity to learn whatever he or she wants to learn

Everybody already acquired the same opportunities to learn when the internet became ubiquitous. The difference is using AI is emphasising efficient, productivity, output - battery farming for GDP, basically.

How about we lie down under a tree chewing on a piece of straw in our mouths as we close our eyes and listen to the trickling stream occasionally splash with the flip of a fish fin? Is that no efficient enough? Should I not be learning something?

We don't do that huckleberry thing anymore, because it's more efficient to be shoveled into a big city to produce more goods and services. Is that objectively a good thing? I'd say absolutely not.

Yes, there's an argument to quality of life in terms of illness and lifespan, but it's the cost of the more abstract things - which I think is absolutely vital - of which AI is going to be responsible for exacerbating the loss (terribly constructed sentence but hopefully you get the idea).

It's a hard concept to put into words