Sometimes I think and I’m like, is it such a bad idea for a community to create a fork basically for trying new things. For example, Monero community should fork Monero, call it Monero 2.0, for basically trying new things on Monero, who better experiments on Monero than Monero people, right? In my opinion, I may be wrong, but the idea of forking to try new things is not very welcomed in crypto except something drastic happens like a hostile takeover or a roll back that some part of the community don’t believe should be rolled up. Whereas the power to actually fork and keep the old chain running or both chains running actually exists.