I hear what you're saying, but is seems like you're a bit guilty of the thing you're calling out. I also posted a link showing a collection of studies, they are completed, and there are many more. I've heard this narrative that the evidence for IVM is weak, but when you actually look at the data and what's being said by SOME medical professionals where their specialization is exactly this material, they're saying that the evidence for Ivermectin is very strong. What is the basis for writing them off while accepting the claims of others? Strong political bias.

I feel like it's incredibly difficult to NOT fall into a camp when it comes to bias and I think the best way is for everyone to admit to themselves that they aren't immune, and to constantly self check, like, why am I so sure I'm right, have I actually honestly engaged the others information, etc. Nothing is so cut and dry I think as this thing is the answer, this thing is bogus.