Source: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/analysis-proves-911-nose-out-videos
I am re-sharing this excellent video analysis by my fellow researcher Conspiracy Cuber. This was originally hosted at my blogger website on the 12th October 2017. The analysis disproves the claim that the plane’s nose exits the WTC building, also known as the "nose-out" which was widely propagated by early 9/11 plane researchers Simon Shack and Ace Baker. The two short analysis videos below are of the utmost value in determining what really exited the South Tower, which was a dust explosion or ejection. ConclusionPlease consider carefully the evidence presented in the two analysis videos, and then be aware of how your perceptions and views have been shaped by Simon Shack (real name Simon Hytten) and Ace Baker, into believing this was a plane’s nose, when indeed it is a dust ejection.Evaluation of new evidenceWhen new evidence is presented, we must assess and evaluate the evidence, which may form a new perspective, which supersedes our previous held perspectives. As an individual, one must have humility to update their perspective, and not cling to old notions, which are incongruent to the truth. Finally, I would ask all of you to seriously consider this evidence, before clinging to old notions suggested to you from Simon Shack and Ace Baker. Thanks for reading and caring!UPDATE: 7th September 2025It has been brought to my attention that Professor James Fetzer is still presenting the dust ejection as a plane’s nose in a recent debate he had with Richard Gage, 6th September 2025. I have recently been engaging via an email thread with professor Fetzer, and even though he has been presented with new video evidence, he still persists to propagate false information about the dust ejection. I can only consider Professor Fetzer’s actions as sinister to say the least, that he is unable to re-evaluate perfectly clear video evidence, which shows without a shadow of a doubt a “dust ejection” and not a plane’s nose exiting the WTC South Tower in the video. See below: What is Professor Fetzer’s motives to misrepresent this video evidence? I will let the reader/viewer make of this what they will. Thanks for reading and caring!
Archived URL: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/analysis-proves-911-nose-out-videos
�� CONTENT HASHES:
SHA-256: fb873b27531ac5a4f35b8404ec3f3063dd9540c3082b4faeb748d272bc365f5a
BLAKE2b: 3b285b50952f7632ea983d0d8de2f824e2855691db866491c83e7e8422fa93e6
MD5: 125d9342eecdefd03426413dbd80a352
�� TITLE HASHES:
SHA-256: 421e588828854f3130fe061d876ba3e0fd26e1fec9d56cacc920be223aeb93d5
BLAKE2b: 8749169d125609191f13e4043c09e6ce2ba9c8550fb5087dbc7b04ea92cd39b2
MD5: 9f188c5a56b83b4c2ecdcdd2080bd129
�� INTEGRITY HASHES:
SHA-256: b9a04c8a9e9d0bc78a3cf0eca5a34f90adc3c629887252b1b11896719db086eb
BLAKE2b: cd5a604b4cf3012c06a0424f2b8c08056f320afba4542f5299b4cd27e0034a59
MD5: e9dfcc3bf81b0d15dff34a0e900a04f2
Archived with ArcHive - Client-side cryptographic archival system