What did Martin Fleischmann know?

Last night I managed to jerry-rig up an old PC and an internal DVD ROM I had laying in a dusty place.I had a reason, I wanted to be able to extract a presentation by Martin Fleischmann from ICCF-7, recorded on April 23, 1998, in Vancouver, Canada. It was provided to me spread across two DVDs by Jeane Manning, so big thanks to her!After that, it took half a day to find a way to get the video and audio out of the VOBs and into a format I can pass on to everyone. When I started reviewing that video, I was quite shocked at what Martin had to say. I will be sharing a series of clips from that video in this blog and then the full video when I have had time to clean it up, audio and data loss-wise.One of the most significant things that I saw him say was that he knew there was something that would effectively connect classical mechanics with quantum field theory and that this was critical to so-called “Cold Fusion”.Here is the first clip and the associated transcript is below.“So I think we are at a very interesting watershed.I hope you probably agree that we can see easy ways to implement the research, difficult ways to implement the research. Well of course this is not the end of the story.Let me just close the loop. There are all sorts of other phenomena which we really can only interpret in terms of quantum field theory and then there is this enormous question of:if we think about condensed matter physics and chemistry, biology, even in terms of quantum field theory, then is there a link between classical mechanics and quantum field theory? I’ve been waiting very patiently for someone to speak about that, because I know the information about parts of the subject exists, but I observe that people are extremely reluctant to say anything about this at all.Thank you.”- Martin Fleischmann’s ICCF-7 presentation, April 23, 1998Martin is suggesting that there are people that know, or have a good idea of what connects these two areas of research.I would argue that the fractal MagnetoHydroDynamic (fMHD) structures we have observed in a wide range of experiments, with their fractal Toroidal Toments (fTM) enable the link between classical mechanics and quantum field theory. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) is considered a branch of classical mechanics. It integrates classical fluid dynamics (governed by the Navier-Stokes equations) with classical electromagnetism (via Maxwell’s equations and the Lorentz force). It treats conducting fluids as continua without invoking quantum or relativistic effects in its standard formulation, aligning with the principles of classical physics. Even though MHD is often applied in contexts like plasma physics or astrophysics, its foundational framework remains classical. - GROKQuantum Field Theory (QFT), firstly unites quantum mechanics with special relativity, addressing high-speed particle behaviours. Second, it accounts for particle creation and annihilation in high-energy processes like collisions. Third, QFT underpins the Standard Model, describing fundamental particles and forces. Fourth, it offers extraordinary predictive precision, matching experiments to many decimal places. It is applicable to everything from condensed matter physics to cosmology and is helping us understand the universe. - GROKIn this second clip, you see him responding to quite a bit of pressure, from a young Francesco Celani, to be more open about what is important to make the process work.Now we are at a watershed and there are some people who have a sort of connection with funding agencies present in this room. I think the re-jigging of the Bohm-Aharonov Effect is long overdue. I think that it’s going to prove to be one of the most fruitful areas of research of the next century.- Martin Fleischmann’s response under pressure fromFrancesco Celani to be more open during Q&A, April 23, 1998It is striking to see Martin Fleischmann state that the Bohm-Aharonov Effect would be one of the most fruitful areas of research in the field of ‘cold fusion’ this century. I did not know this until I looked at this presentation today.I started this blog focusing on this very Effect.Martin Fleischmann appears to also be making a sideways comment towards the funding agencies which, to the best of my knowledge, were at this time the DOE/US military and, more specifically, in my best guess, the US Navy. Did they know?We know from the 1980s presidential declaration on nuclear technology, that magnetohydrodynamics is the Sigma-1 secret of nuclear weapons. As you are aware, I believe that the phase singularities of the fractal magnetohydrodynamic structures we have observed, are able to produce the Aharonov-Bohm Effect as per the calculations of Afanasiev and Dubovik. Moreover, this electrodynamic structure and its properties enable Coherent Energy Transformations.I wish Martin Fleischmann were alive to see this day. I am not afraid to talk about what I believe connects classical mechanics to quantum field theory. I feel myself fortunate that I was never part of any military research programme or had signed any related non-disclosure agreements.Born before the Second World War and living through the Cold War, if he knew something, Martin understandably had to be guarded, given his history and his time. That said, I have new found respect for this brilliant electrochemist today. He either knew that this was the way forward or he had come to realise it would be.You can download the paper related to the presentation using the button below.COLD FUSION; PAST, PRESENT & FUTUREA very senior and respected researcher asked me for some detail on the connections I was suggesting in this blog and so I gave the following answer. I am copying it here for openness.Dear Xxxxx,I have explained this in all my recent lectures, but the key references I gave in my Strasbourg presentationPeople normally only think of MHD in terms of a vortex soliton. This was the mistake that was made by Lord Kelvin. When you only have a standard vortex soliton, the stability collapses relatively quickly.Virial stability increases as orthogonal fractality builds. Minimally, you need a wheel within a wheel within a wheel structure. This enables the electrodynamics to produce a non-radiating boundary without having to have an oscillating electric and magnetic structure, as in Zeldovich’s anapole. I focused on the coherence phenomena reported by several authors and its relation to a monopole-like structure in my 2021 presentation in Assisi, Italy.Assisi 2021 - LENR in a CanIn this presentation, I gave a brief overview of why I suspect data from Ohmasa Gas experiments in 2019 are the result of nuclear reactions. Slides for the presentation will be published after the premiere.I spoke about the toroidal moment in my 2022 presentation in Assisi, Italy. In this presentation, I showed a mainstream Physical Review B paper with the structure that I predicted would be found in cavitation-based coherent energy transformation systems.ULTR - A simple quick and repeatable demonstration of the LENR processHere is my presentation, given at the International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (ISCMNS) conference in Assisi, 2022. It draws upon a host of dynamic water based patents and experiments starting from 1980, where transmutations, relying on weak interactions, are clearly demonstrated. In light of my previously proposed fractal toroids, tha…The fractal toroidal moment structure that I predicted was later found in multiple reactor cores analysed by myself, that were produced by Professor Bin-Juine Huang.O-Day - Flux capacitorThis presentation looks at the findings that came from looking at the collapsed inner pipe of the DHX-2 reactor of Bin-Juine Huang et. al. Here is a video showing the sample loaded in the SEM/EDX at Alan Goldwater’s magic sound lab prior to analysis.The elements synthesised in these structures are those found by many authors in the field. Because of the amount of material that comes out of these structures, the originating matter has to be in a coherent (likely fully ionised) state in the core. Since you know the possible elements that go in (for instance, in the case of Huang, hydrogen, oxygen, and copper), there has to be some Electro-nuclear collapse and regeneration as observed by Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto in the cores.The coherence is caused by the topological monopole, which is a Dirac-compliant topological monopole. Bogdanovich et al. at the Moscow Nuclear Physics Institute cite Vishnevsky’s 2008 paper. In that paper, Vishnevsky states that superconductivity also is a result of this topological monopole being produced. The topological monopole enforces coherence in even fermions like electrons at any initial temperature by way of the Aharonov-Bohm effect that has previously been calculated as present in these fractal electrodynamic structures by Dubovik and Afanasiev, as given in the reference that I gave in Strasbourg. The matter collapse comes from the increasing magnetic core strengths and coherent wavelets trapped in each of the cores and sub-cores. When the electrodynamic structure, that causes the phase singularity, confinement, and coherence, fails, the matter waves re-emerge into the ordinary vacuum energy state via a wormhole, as stated by Matsumoto and observed by us, whereupon it collapses and is reborn, regenerating into new nuclei based on wavelet interference density typical of stellar synthesis, assuming the matter wave density in the coherent core is not too high. In S.V. Adamenko’s book, Controlled Nucleus Synthesis, he says that if the electron cloud/nucleus/nucleon macro-cluster gets too dense in the core, the process will rapidly go beyond iron to produce very heavy elements.In brief, in any charge-separated or ionic material that undergoes extreme multi-axis hydrodynamic shear, fractal magnetohydrodynamic structures will be produced that can subsequently, be additionally injected with helicity to produce fractal-toroidal moments. At the core of these fractal-toroidal moments, matter is drawn in and cohered into matter wavelets that ultimately unify the forces (within the structure’s different space-time metrics) and allow for matter wave interference and matter collapse. This is achieved by way of the inherent Aharonov-Bohm effect that results from these fractal magneto-hydrodynamic structures. Any ‘energy’ potential produced by reducing the distortion in the physical vacuum in the process, is 1. shared amongst all of the matter wavelets in the phase singularity cores and 2. maintains the virial stability of the oval structure. For some reason, these structures seem to last for around two days without further helicity injection. This may just be hysteresis in their virial stability. That is to say, when spun up, they can gather enough matter into their cores to sustain their stability for up to two days. They need to spin to feed and feed to spin. If they don’t get food or spin, they die.Not over driving these little machines for too long and too hard is a good thing. They should be initiated, built, and then broken. Rinse, repeat. You might like to think of it as using the binding energy release to wind up a spring, and then that spring releases that energy upon confinement field collapse. The energy is shared between every single emergent particle and regenerated nuclei.This way you can remediate nuclear waste extremely efficiently and synthesise new elements, particularly those that are good for supporting biology, for instance for feeding soil. For me, this will be a tool that will not only get us to new worlds but allow us to create the nutrients necessary for farming on exoplanets, potentially Mars initially. I talk about this with reference to the Huang data recently.There is no need for the layman to have mathematics to know, all they need do is look at the material analysis of the cores of Huang reactors done in the flux capacitor video. In the video, [Magnetic] “Flux Capacitor” structures that are the resultant forms produced from fractal-toroidal moments are the actors capturing matter, condensing it beyond the internal possible volume, and ejecting it as new synthesised elements. That the maths have already been done in the past to explain this is helpful. In the near future, the maths relating to the specific case analysis will be done.Kind regardsBob

🔐 Cryptographic Verification

�� CONTENT HASHES: SHA-256: b99cbcc4e8055f28700f4a013f0b6eb82d7d30f2b84d1b5a9cc7899f22bedfdf BLAKE2b: dbed60983cd560a484239a90e23510cb98c9076c345db2701443638b34afc799 MD5: 8a9a93c44a5fcb8f649c11ebf06d28eb �� TITLE HASHES: SHA-256: f68969d979a45d32150765c067ca504c8aeb1b3bf0a68bbec2192e0f59d6c153 BLAKE2b: 161e991826606ab2fd034375e1796b11641550c0541064a5333d3898dd003fcb MD5: 429a89dc5b5d5f21cb9e16bbaa3bdae2 �� INTEGRITY HASHES: SHA-256: eeb4f07e4f214472e3eb4fae13e48765041d379b5940ba9741baf8a76e00d7d1 BLAKE2b: 60c35731896db9c26c0704ef4d793651353e9d14bb0e66510bc16c764993e631 MD5: 8b2af1a4dd10cfa567b9bc2308195f61

Archived with ArcHive - Client-side cryptographic archival system