I've been thinking, following the Dunbar logic, and probably the expansion of the subject of our tribal relationship ranges. I have something for you, I say its a good starting point.

Here’s a simple, transparent “Curation‑Quality Score” on a 1–10 scale. It rewards:

• Breadth – how many different authors you vote for
• Outreach – how much voting weight you send outside your core circle
• Anti‑self‑vote – penalizes heavy self‑voting

1. Definitions (over last 7 days)

• Let Wₜₒₜ = total vote‑weight you’ve cast (sum of all your vote percentages).
• Let U = number of unique authors you’ve voted for.
• Sort those authors by vote‑weight received, pick the top 50.
• Let W₅₀ = sum of vote‑weight you sent to those top 50 authors.
• Let Wₛ = vote‑weight you cast on yourself.

2. Sub‑scores

1. Breadth (B) = min(U ÷ 50, 1.0)
   • 0 if you only voted 0 authors; 1.0 if you voted ≥ 50 distinct authors.
2. Outreach (O) = (Wₜₒₜ − W₅₀) ÷ Wₜₒₜ
   • fraction of your weight going outside your top 50.
3. Anti‑Self (S) = 1 − (Wₛ ÷ Wₜₒₜ)
   • 1.0 if you never self‑vote; decreases toward 0 as self‑voting grows.

Each sub‑score runs from 0 to 1.

3. Combine & Scale

Take a weighted average (equal weights here):

RawScore = (B + O + S) / 3

Convert to 1–10:

CurationScore = round( RawScore * 9 ) + 1

So RawScore=0→score 1; RawScore=1→score 10.

4. Examples

• A votes only 10 authors, all weight to those → low breadth & outreach
• B hits 50 authors but no outreach beyond them → middling
• C votes 100 authors, most weight outside top 50 → near perfect
• D mixes some outreach but heavy self‑vote drags score down

5. How to implement

1. Pull your last‑7‑day vote history via Hive API.
2. Compute Wₜₒₜ, tally weight per author, count U, identify top 50 and W₅₀, measure self‑vote Wₛ.
3. Calculate B, O, S, then RawScore and map to 1–10.
4. Display “CurationScore: X/10” alongside a mini‑chart of your B, O, S sub‑scores.

That gives you a quick, intuitive metric of how thoughtfully you’re curating beyond your inner circle—rewarding exploration, penalizing collusion, and still allowing for healthy core‑community support.