Minimum writing words on your post is 300 words to get upvotes.

This is maybe the only rule I would dare to criticize.
Why does a GOOD photo really needs a 300 word bla-bla-bla?
After all, we are talking here about the "Photography community", right?

I like criticism from anyone, because criticism will bring change. I made a rule of 300 words, because I don't want anyone to later say that I'm curating for those who post images just write a few words. And as I said above, that the rules can be changed at any time, as long as it will have a good impact.

Well, if some minimum is needed (yes, probably it is), I would not want to be forced to write more than 150-200 words.

Yeah, maybe there's some truth to what you say. That we are talking about "Photography community" maybe
300 words is probably too much. So maybe we can change it to 150-200 words.

And we don't have to force them to write 300 words, it's just that if they post not according to the rules they won't get upvotes. But other curators can upvote the post even if they post not according to the rules in "POB Photography", as long as they don't upvote for plagiarized posts.

Count on my regular support.

I am glad to see your words. I think this idea will work with there have your support. :)