What particular, specific problem your method (by creating pob.voter) solves, which can not be done or solved by the original proofofbrainio account? Maybe I'm to dumb to get it, so please pinpoint it to me.

I mean, like this. If I think that can access proofofbrainio account only POB project manager. So I'm not sure that POB project manager will give permission to manage proofofbrainio account by someone else. So the solution for this is to create a @pob.voter account to be managed by a person who is trusted by the POB project manager to do curation on the POB platform. But this idea is only if the POB project manager doesn't have time to curate on the POB platform, and if now he has time to curate again in the POB, my idea is no longer necessary because he can provide curation directly through the proofofbrainio account without having to create a @pob.voter account. :) If that's what you want to know.

Voting automation (without true, read-it-first curation) is easy and requires no human resource, it can be done in no time, if the owner has a wish to.

Yes! You are right, but sometimes this method can make posts on the POB platform not of quality. Because when giving curation without reading the post.

Where the actual problem originates is that true good curation needs to do "read-it-first", and this requires very limited and high value resource - TIME. Which none of us have in excess.

Nah! These are wise words. If I think I need to improve reading first before curating, why do that? Yeah, for good curation and for the quality of posts on the POB platform. Although it can take a lot of time to do curation, but it will have a good impact on the platform.