RE: RE: Hard Fork 21: A Case For the 50/50 Curation Reward Model
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hard Fork 21: A Case For the 50/50 Curation Reward Model

Words
186
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

Hey crypto.piotr@crypto.piotr thank you for your memo I appreciate it!
First of all, thank you for directing this topic to me. It is completly new to me. I was reading the article and some comments to get a broad overview.

From my perspective, you demotivate authors because they get paid less and incentivize whales which already have a lot of money.

The business model changes more to pay to win strategy, which is sad in my opinion. People who have more -> get more and people that are trying to start from the bottom without investments have it even harder.

On the other hand, it is nice because you can now passively generate income with a certain amount of Steem. Meaning that you invest some money and get a decent return for just autovoting.

That would also mean that the interaction and the really "active" user will decrease. But in the end we only see the results when it happened. My first gut feeling is not that good, but humans are habit people. They are afraid of change :P

I am curious about the future :)