Why should I tell you who to vote for?
I'm not asking you to. Trust me, I will make up my mind upon seeing a post.
That is just plain lazy, you go out there and read and make up your mind who you think deserves your vote.
The context was asking you to prove your claim that there exist plenty of under-rewarded posts. So far you have been able to produce none.
You think I should do your work for you?
It's everyone's job to help under-rewarded content get the attention it deserves. It's impossible for one individual to find everything. Steem relies on crowdsourcing content discovery and rewarding. You adamantly refuse to be helpful. Instead, you just complain. Judging by the fact that your post was resteemed, some people think it deserved attention.
No wonder this platform is fucked up.
You are certainly not helping.
At least it seems you like what I write , you seem to read a lot of it,
You're delusional. This piece caught my eye because it was resteemed by someone else.
but since you don't agree with me don't read me, read someone else someone who you can give your vote to and make the platform grow.
I commented on your drivel because you made a reference to one of our old conversations in a way that didn't accurately reflect its content.
RE: Manual Curation