I see, thanks.

On another note, what do you think of making curation rewards "linear"? Currently, people auto-vote content creators who tend to get lots of upvotes in order to maximize curation rewards, but that obviously disturbs natural PoB.

If instead, one would get the same curation rewards independently of what he voted on, one would start voting for the content he enjoys.

The reason for increasing curation rewards is to encourage people to find undervalued posts, but it is fair to say that this has failed. What I see instead is that curators find out which content creators have a dedicated group of upvoters and start to front-run the votes. This leads to a concentration of rewards on known content creators and destroys pure enjoyment.

I think that for a social media platform to be enjoyable, people just need to curate what they enjoy. Currently, if you enjoy a post that is guaranteed not to get upvotes after you, then you are missing out on curation rewards. Doesn't seem right as a model.