It makes your opinion at odds with mine, but it doesn't prove me wrong or you right.

This is a simple comparison of numbers, but if you want to call it an opinion, that's fine.

You appear to be misunderstanding or mischaracterizing the data.

That is not my interpretation, but the conclusion of the authors of the study you based your post on. It is written in plain English in their conclusions: "Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant"
If that is not sufficient, it's repeated at least a couple of times in the main study text in various forms and details. In case you want to check their findings yourself, it is all there in the Model3 data.