Quick correction: Aurora, Colorado.

I must say I enjoyed reading this response, sean-king. You have a very interesting point of view and your time spent studying this subject really shows! But I still disagree with your logic on several

@sean-king I ran out of room to keep replying in our thread since we hit the six deep mark. So here's the continuation- Books are written across a vast array of genres. A lot of these genres require a

Simply because someone starts out as a fundamentalist Christian doesn't mean they're not now out to prove that the Bible can't be trusted with an agenda. In retrospect I might change anti-Bible to

Admittedly, I haven't read what you wrote outside of this article. But the un-cited scholars I was referring to are up in your section about Paul's "Pastoral Letters". You start off that section

There are a lot of un-cited assumptions in this article. If you're going to try to disprove the Bible, you're going to need to go in to immense detail and cite every "scholar" that you're referring

As some previous commenters have noted, religion is not God. I totally agree. As a Christian I can only speak from my years of studying the Bible, apologetics, hermeneuitcs, secular art history, and

I'm not sure you can safely make a objective distinction between "modern" science and what you're calling "science as actual personal knowledge". Science has a standard definition,

One has to wonder - The people in power know the end from the means of war. They've studied it and encouraged it for their own manipulative and horrendous agendas for ages. Why are they promulgating the

Nothing personal, but the argument that Islam is the correct religion based on a "golden mean" figure has so many holes in it it's not even considerable as a smoking gun by any scientific or

Hello @veritopian! I do think that science and superstition/religion are compatible. They are separate in many ways, but very much intertwined and compliment each other often in my experience. There are

Your definition of logic rests solely on empirical data. My definition of logic goes beyond our flawed human ability to describe the universe -- because it has to. There are many things that science cannot

Always intriguing to look more closely at our moon. Crrow777 on Youtube has some interesting insight with what he and others have filmed, too. Make what you will of his opinions, but the lunar wave he

Religion is not God. You cannot safely assume the non-existence of God by citing a lack of evidence held within a book(s). That's a logical fallacy. Ask a Christian Apologetic where they get their validation

We're in total agreement with regards to the sad reality of the military meat grinder. But I have to disagree with your statement about the content of Christian's holy book leading to burning and stoning