RE: RE: Solving Schrödinger‘s Equations With Quantum AI
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Solving Schrödinger‘s Equations With Quantum AI

maar(52)
Published in
GEMS
Words
129
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

I don't agree, but I respect your idea in metaphysical matters.
But to say that Schrödinger's idea is wrong, as you said "a false premise", is to completely deny the understanding of matter itself we acquired by mean of Schrödinger's (and other people) ideas. I am talking on a materialistic level, of course.

For what concerns your idea about what time is, what role emotions play in the "sensible world", it could be interesting to talk, but, it not need quantum mechanics or the critics to all the research done 'till now.
A old good metaphysics is always welcome, but it is what it is: speculation. Unless you prove it. Because even for metaphysics, it may be defined (in an epistemological way) a proof. And that's an other story.

@maar: I don't agree, | Ecency