太荒唐了,我都没看过你们的原文,居然说是抄袭!
It's ridiculous. I haven't read your original, but I say it's plagiarism!

如果你是官方的,我可以把我这段中文翻译英文给你,但如果你不是,就不要多事了.
If you are official, I can translate my Chinese into English for you, but if you are not, ignore it!

你确定,你是懂知识产权法的吗?
Are you sure you understand the intellectual property law?

1. 引述事实和新闻的信息,会有雷同,这是完全正常的,不是侵权要件.你举的这段内容,也并非完全一样.这么小段的对事实的描述,会有雷同,是比较常见的.
2. 引述的内容占总体文章的比例过低,也不涉及侵权,
3. 引述事实的描述,而得出不同的主观评论,也不涉及侵权.

根据youtube的示范,你那怕把一个内容(文字/视频)完全打乱重组后,表达不同的主观判断,也不属于侵权!

另外,如果不懂中文,也不懂知识产权,就不要乱评判和downvote,谢谢!
By the way, if you don't know Chinese or intellectual property, don't judge and downvote randomly. Thank you!