The would depend on the established rules the community as a whole decided.

That's the magic sauce though. That's the trick. On a blockchain, that actually has to be decided and coded into the chain protocol. We actually have to be extremely specific to do that. What specifics could we come up with?

Well if one person gets more than one vote why even Vote? Isn't that a fake election?

Depends on how you decide vote weight. For example, should your gardener and your heart surgeon have the same vote weight when it comes to cutting you open to do surgery? Not everyone is an expert in every area and not everyone has the same skin in the game within every community.

That is what we have now here and in the world!

I'd argue we have violence ruling the world today. Yes, capital is part of that, but it's the governments that make the laws, regulations, and such. If we had voluntary interactions without threats of violence, capital (some call a dollar bill a "certificate of appreciation") would be far less of a problem, IMO. Especially if you consider voluntary, competing currencies (not what we have now which is controlled by banksters who fund wars)

There has to be a way to know who each account is and if it is a legit person.

This is what Voice on EOS is attempting to do, but many are pushing back citing privacy concerns. If everyone is known, that's also a powerful tool for dictators and central governments (similar to what is happening in China right now with their reputation score system).

Thanks for responding. I've been very busy lately, but I was able to get in a reply. :)