Not being sarcastic, I genuinely find this to be a bad joke.
Last year Peakd did the narrative pivot to squeeze money out of the DHF with the move towards "opensource" which they put almost no effort in whatsoever, just to get funded, now you are doing it.
Well jolly good. The same ninja move works out twice. Just have to pivot. Did Sergio recommend you do it like this, or did you think of it yourself?
RE: What Hive Would Look Like Without Funded Public Goods