RE: RE: Reward Censorship & "Emma's Dilemma" (or How the Meme Saustrich Gets Made).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Reward Censorship & "Emma's Dilemma" (or How the Meme Saustrich Gets Made).

Words
183
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y

This was heavily addressed in my post. No one, since the beginning of civilization, has ever been able to control the abuse factor sustainably. Which is why the only solution is to increase one's own personal power and influence. Period. Has always been so.

ALGORAND

If content (or any transaction) is flagged, an alert is sent to 1000 RANDOM delegates. If a delegate fails to respond in 2 hours, then their option is forfeit and their option is assigned to another RANDOM delegate. The delegates are incentivised with ALGORAND TOKENS to vote in these juries, with an added bonus for voting with the majority (if there is one). A majority of 60% is required in order to remove material or cancel a transaction. If there is a 59%/41% split, the content in question REMAINS UNAFFECTED.

There is no "liar's dividend". No content can be removed without a jury trial.

THIS SYSTEM IS A DECENTRALIZED IMPARTIAL PROCRUSTEAN JURY OF YOUR PEERS.
THIS SYSTEM IS A DECENTRALIZED IMPARTIAL PROCRUSTEAN JURY OF YOUR PEERS.
THIS SYSTEM IS A DECENTRALIZED IMPARTIAL PROCRUSTEAN JURY OF YOUR PEERS.

@logiczombie: This was heavily | Ecency