RE: RE: Meno's paradox or the obviousness of the truth
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Meno's paradox or the obviousness of the truth

Words
95
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

Ok, that seems right.

Try this.

In order to clearly delineate "truth" from "not truth", you must explicitly define what "can be true" and "what can never be true".

QUANTA versus QUALIA.

QUANTA = REAL-TRUE-FACTS which must be empirically verifiable and or logically necessary and demonstrable and indisputable and tautological and emotionally MEANINGLESS.

QUALIA = Qualitative, experiential, personal, OPINION, unverifiable and unfalsifiable PRIVATE, indemonstrable GNOSIS and most importantly, emotionally MEANINGFUL.

OPINION (QUALIA) can NEVER be considered "true" because OPINION holds no truth-value.

This severely limits the scope of potential REAL-TRUE-FACTS.

Click to watch 23 seconds,

@logiczombie: Ok, that seems | Ecency