These are good examples of why you should NEVER speak about your GNOSIS.

These "truths" are QUALIA (indistinguishable from opinion).

They are "interesting" and can open your mind to new perspectives, but they are not "true" and should not be mistaken for "truth" (they are also not "untrue" or "false").

Language is baby-talk that has been codified and calcified.

Here's an example of what I'm getting at, ***

Language has "deeper meaning" but that "deeper meaning" is different depending on who's looking (GNOSIS).

I found some interesting examples while studying ancient Chinese pictograms.

The pictogram for "good" is a combination of "fat" (which is also translated as "delicious") and "sheep".

In modern usage "good" is so abstract it is nearly meaningless.

In ancient times, "good" meant "like a fat delicious sheep", which of course you can use to feed and clothe your family. It's a much more literal and practical term and doesn't lend itself as well to the fallacy of "opposites".

Another example is the pictogram for "evil", which is the same pictogram as "heart" but drawn crooked or deformed. It's literally "a deformed or malformed heart". It lends itself more to the idea that "evil" is simply misguided "good" intentions.

When thinking about this, I found that "modern language" just seems hollow and fake.

We make so many assumptions just based on word parings and the fallacy of "opposites".

People read a dictionary and they "think" they "know" something (but it's just a tiny fraction).

You sort of have to "weave your own web" so to speak (and don't tell anyone).