The professor in your Harvard lecture is a charming and charismatic CON-ARTIST.

He's leading the students down his primrose-path, while dodging FUNDAMENTAL LOGIC, by presenting false-dichotomy after false-dichotomy.

The very definitions of "utilitarian" and "ethics" are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

This professor never considers basic definitions (PRIMARY AXIOMS).

This professor didn't even hint that the very definition of "murder" is critically flawed.

Then he calls KANT'S DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS, "categorical ethics"? WTF?

Aren't all categories of ethics technically "categorical"??

The only person who made a lick of sense was the very last audience member who spoke about feeding their family. +PROHUMAN +PROFAMILY

There areprobably hundreds of problems with this entire discussion, but two very important topics which were 100% absent include "the fundamental attribution error" AND "human instinct".